Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are OUT of the Watson race


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's hilarious that Tepper has been trying his ass off for over a year and two division rivals come in late and immediately surpass all of his efforts. What a reality check.

You don’t learn if you don’t try. Hopefully him failing … doesn’t change his “I want it, I’ll try my damnest to get it” attitude

 

The dude could have folded over a long time ago but stayed persistent  … he has his flaws but that’s a good strength to have in an owner 

 

 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

We are officially a poverty franchise.

Thank you David Tepper and Matt Rhule.

This is fuging hilarious.

We are. I have never disliked an owner of a team more than Tepper and that includes Jerry Jones and Daniel Snyder. The guy  is a greasy egomaniac. It’s likely best we didn’t land Mr Handjob but Tepper just made himself look like a drooling teenager chasing his first piece of ass only to get face palmed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

You don’t learn if you don’t try. Hopefully him failing … doesn’t change his “I want it, I’ll try my damnest to get it” attitude

 

The dude could have folded over a long time ago but stayed persistent  … he has his flaws but that’s a good strength to have in an owner 

 

 

It's really not. He needs to accept he's out of his element, get some help to build a real football organization, then get out of their way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's really not. He needs to accept he's out of his element, get some help to build a real football organization, then get out of their way. 

Arthur blank went after Watson, not Fontenot. Owners own their teams, they have final say. As fans, we only have opinions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

They aren’t going to listen. It’s not the ending that they wanted.

yep ..cam did many great things for us..but for some the love affair with him is odd..dude clearly isnt what he used to be..that showed this past season when he came back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...