Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are Browns getting Watson???


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

Has anybody stopped to think how lopsided the conferences are in terms of QB’s:

AFC:  Mahomes, Allen, Burrow, Herbert, Lamar, Watson, Wilson, Carr.

NFC:  Aging Rodgers, Aging Brady, Murray, Dak, Stafford, and ????

Is Cousins seriously the 6th best QB in the NFC?  
 

Look at these potential names starting for NFC teams:  Goff, Fields, Lock, Lance, Jones, Wentz, Winston, Ryan, Darnold, Hurts. Yikes. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No, the Panthers never had a shot.

Think about it......it truly came down to $$$$$$$$$$$$$ and our richest NFL owner was like "nah" after simping hardcore for 2 years. Im shocked.

 

Finally Tepper needs to return his brass balls, fraud. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

And virtually all of the leagues top QBs stay in the afc

panthers still have a shot to be *the* team in their conference but they have to get their guy and they have to do it now

Who is the guy that we can get that will dominate the NFC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Basbear said:

My god....MY GODS....... I guess the report about the panthers NOT allowing his 3rd and 4th years to be fully guaranteed was in fact a fact....my god... The kicker in all new information is it did come down to money and the richest NFL owner passed....... craziest NFL off-season evar. 

I never saw your personal Watson take, honestly where were you? Would you have bought a watson jersey or let your daughter wear one? Or turner your back forever on being a panther fan?

I would've remained a fan and been excited about this. People compartmentalize and rationalize war crimes when they vote and I'd have found a way to make excuses for a sex pest on my sports team. Thankfully we don't have to do that now. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Think about it......it truly came down to $$$$$$$$$$$$$ and our richest NFL owner was like "nah" after simping hardcore for 2 years. Im shocked.

 

Finally Tepper needs to return his brass balls, fraud. 

Lol nah he can keep them. You have to have them when you're on the precipice of what you wanted and realized that the cost ain't worth it and the best move is to walk away. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...