Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers closing in on Duane Brown

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not talking about missing games, I'm talking about rapidly decking physical ability.

Lol he would instantly be the best LT we have had since Gross. He is still performing at a high level and is fairly dependable overall. He performed well last season even though the remainder of the line was garbage (see Motons performance this year with terrible play across the rest of the line). It would be a very short term contract so I see no harm here in upgrading a position that is currently in the tank. It would give us a ton of flexibility in the upcoming draft and really shore up our team other than QB and head coach, we seem to be solid across the board with a singing like this.

Edited by WarPanthers89
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cpt slay a ho Mentor

Cpt slay a ho

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I think they’ll let him reach otherwise why keep him? If we’re content with Darnold and another losing season then why not bring in a coach who can start to build his team for 2023?

Rhule is fighting for his job and he’s going to do everything to try and save it, even if it’s reaching for a QB.

Not sure but wasn’t Rhule forced to get some staff with nfl experience this offseason ? If so they’re already handcuffing him to an extent.

Rhule has had his chances at qbs, he made his bed, I believe if we truly believe we were a qb away, DW would be a panther, but if we weren’t willing to spend the assets and money on a certified franchise qb, I have to believe they won’t let Rhule waste the #6 pick on an attempt to save his job, at least I’m hoping not. 

a healthy dose of cmc and a upgraded o line imo will yield a better chance of winning than reaching on a qb that normally wouldn’t be pick until the 2nd or 3rd rounds in other qb draft classes.

now I could be wrong on the qbs this draft but I don’t see none of them drastically changing our next season outcome. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Lol he would instantly be the best LT we have had since Gross. He is still performing at a high level and is fairly dependable overall. He performed well last season even though the remainder of the line was garbage (see Motons performance this year with terrible play across the rest of the line). It would be a very short term contract so I see no harm here in upgrading a position that is currently in the tank. It would give us a ton of flexibility in the upcoming draft and really shore up our team other than QB and head coach, we seem to be solid across the board with a singing like this.

That's what you hope. Or he could show up looking 37 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
austin1227 Collaborator

austin1227

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Actionman0z said:

I don’t think that’s the case at all. Get Brown, and Cross at 6 learns from the best elder statesmen for a year. And then you have a LT for the next 10-15 years 

Bro what cross isn't a qb 😹 if you're taking a tackle at 6 he better be a day 1 starter lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...