Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield Trade Rumors: Saints, Panthers Tabbed as Suitors for Browns QB


Chad_Cota
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, trueblade said:

They should send US a 4th for taking on the contract. Its not like they have a ton of options right now, especially with Jameis signing.

He's in the last year of his rookie deal, contract isn't an issue

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

The operative word here is “might”. I don’t see the Panthers having any good interest in Mayfield. I don’t think he fits McAdoo’s revamped offense and this is speculation and a probable attempt to drum up trade interest. Saints have a void at QB and may certainly be interested.

Saints got their qb now lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jmac said:

*I hate his stupid ass commercials....does that count?

* even though the one with Alice C. makes that one acceptable

 

 

Yes.  That is a valid reason. 

Of course you are kidding--me as well.

If you give Baker a clean pocket, he can be effective.  When he improvises, he gets stupid.  That is my take on him.

I also do not think he is a good leader.  I think his teammates do not like him. 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, trueblade said:

They should send US a 4th for taking on the contract. Its not like they have a ton of options right now, especially with Jameis signing.

He's on a rookie deal. I would do it for a 3rd if we swap Darnold and they take on his contract

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

With Jameis Winston signing with the Saints I'd say Baker's possible landing places are:

Seattle

Carolina

Houston

That's about it, unless a surprise team enters the fold like NYG or DET.

He is going to Seattle.  They are in the best position to accommodate him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...