Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ian Rapoport: Carolina Panthers seem to be the most likely spot for Baker Mayfield


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

You guys sound like you are arguing over the ugly chick at closing time.  

A wise man once told me that when you get to the club "go ugly early". His reasoning was that she would buy you drinks and she would also start to look real good around closing time.

Can't argue with that.

Well, after many a beer during the course of the games last season, I must not have drank enough because Darnold just got uglier as the games, and similarly the season, went on. It was a sobering experience. 

J/k

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So playoffs or bust?  If he makes playoffs you comfortable giving him a 3 year deal with starters money?  40 mill per

I mentioned more than the playoffs--I mentioned not opening up his baggage.  Comfortable is not the right word, but if he plays well and there is no locker room garbage, you have to consider it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I mentioned more than the playoffs--I mentioned not opening up his baggage.  Comfortable is not the right word, but if he plays well and there is no locker room garbage, you have to consider it.

I hear ya, I just think that is too fine of a needle to thread.  Kid seems like a poo head.  A mediocre talented poo head

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Maybe you should ditch the Antonio Brown avy if you are going to drive the "Robby is a diva GTFO" train

Haha man you don’t understand the avatar then. It’s brown with a panthers hat on running out of the stadium like panthers fans were last season. I don’t want that fool on the panthers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Why do people take offense to disses on Robby? No one defends Sam, no one defended Teddy, no one defended Clausen, no one defended the no name RBs and LBs who didn't do jack, etc. Why are some of you all, ohhh poor Robby!

?

The better question is why are you upset that a player on the panthers thinks a guy on another team is bad and that Robbie Anderson criticizing the Browns backup QB is going to cause an issue in our locker room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Snake said:

Look if the Browns pay half his salery and send us a pick I'm all for it. If not let's play the draft lotto and see how it shakes out. 

yeah, that or take Darnold in an even swap--no picks.  I'd put him on a gag order and send him to some leadership academy for kids with Napoleonic complexes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

What qualifies you to call someone who’s at the height of their profession a loser?

Lol!!!! What qualifies anyone to say anything about anything? Robby sure is running his mouth these days. Everyone including you has an opinion about sh*t and posts it on this board. What a brain dead comment.

Side note the height of his profession? Did you watch Robby this year? If that’s the height of his career then YIKES

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...