Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Athletic mock projects NC State tackle to Panthers


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Icky and Moton as bookends... i'd love it. 

and then with a Corbett, Bozeman, BC interior....

happy season 4 GIF by Broad City

i'd almost say after that, trade all the rest of the picks away and add them onto next year's draft, pack it up, and go home before we fug anything up.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair, if it played out that way within this mock scenario, we'd still get Charles Cross.

(unless we took a quarterback instead) 😕

I'd be OK with Cross for sure, any QB in the top 15 would make me even less interested in the team.

We need to stop pussyfooting with the LT position...just get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Icky and Moton as bookends... i'd love it. 

and then with a Corbett, Bozeman, BC interior....

happy season 4 GIF by Broad City

i'd almost say after that, trade all the rest of the picks away and add them onto next year's draft, pack it up, and go home before we fug anything up.

LOL.

If we got Icky...that's exactly what I was hoping they do.  Let the new coaching staff have these picks next year.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember last year when it was widely reported that the Niners moved up for Mac Jones?  I keep hearing the rumors about Walker going #1, but I am not sure he'd be in my top 5.

I am also hearing that the Giants like Cross--want a pass-blocking OT and they like him over Neal and Ikwonu. 

There is some interesting talk about the top 2 CBs--and Houston and the Jets are possible spots.

Detroit:  Please take a QB....Please!

I think 2 Edge rushers (Hutchinson and Thibodeaux) will be gone before we pick-probably 3.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...