Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers should take a QB (article)


Growl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rumors are the Steelers are talking to the Giants about #7.  Why #7 and not #6?  I think everyone in the League knows our QB interest in the draft at #6 is 100% smoke.  Rhule+rookie QB=canned...everyone knows this.  However, the Falcons' interest in Willis at #8 seems legit, so that's why they are poking around at #7 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It would be my wet dream for Pickett to go to NO and Willis to Atlanta.   Let those franchises deal with that garbage

I know some people believe this is a terrible class but with our luck one of them would go on to be a thorn in our side for years. That's just how things go for this snakebit franchise.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that gives me pause that we might take a qb is mcadoo and fitterers comments. Mcadoo has been so right on the money the past five seasons with qbs. He had Mahomes, Allen and Lamar #1 and #2 in their respective classes. Those are the rawest 3 prospects in their classes who turned into mvp’s or in mvp discussions with Allen. My hope is that they override rhules dumbass and take Malik at 6 and the majority of this board melts the fug down while I laugh and clap. 

Edited by TheRumGone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

There are people here who want an OT at #6 because this is an OT draft.....and we haven't had a decent OL in a long time.   Which is the key cog along w/ QB to have offense in the NFL. 

I want an OT because I think that the talent level is higher there than at QB and LT is one of our key positions of need. That's not to say that QB isn't or couldn't be the pick, I am just saying that for me, I haven't seen the QB tape that makes me look at one of them and say "that's our future." 

If we had the 2nd and 3rd round picks to pursue some of our other needs, I'd be more open to QB at 6, buy we don't have those picks. I will say it really bothers me that we brought in Campen to evaluate our line talent but Rhule has the ultimate say in who starts. Why hire these guys if you aren't going to listen to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm higher on OT because it's the perfect fit  Valued position, team need, draft strength and player ranking..

We need LT, the position is valued at our draft pick, the players are ranked in that area of the draft ...

It's really that simple..

Without adding in lame duck coaching staff..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Growl said:

It’s not. I agree wholeheartedly with what TRG said. They’ve spent enormous resources on building the 1980’s football team that so many here want in accordance with Matt rhules archaic philosophy on football since he got here, and the fanbase will be the ones reaping the whirlwind, some of them gladly.

 

id love to be wrong but it seems pretty obvious they’re just gonna stay put and take the third best offensive tackle in the class, before drafting #10 next season when we’re all having the exact same discussion (well not me, pretty sure I’m done)

at this point it’s probably just best to hope the QBs don’t go to the teams you hate. 

Doubt it, Tepper will overrule Rhule this years and take a QB. Unless they have a Baker trade in the works is gonna be QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

I'm higher on OT because it's the perfect fit  Valued position, team need, draft strength and player ranking..

We need LT, the position is valued at our draft pick, the players are ranked in that area of the draft ...

It's really that simple..

Without adding in lame duck coaching staff..

Huge need + top tier talent = You Think Wow GIF by Bounce

Huge need + mediocre talent = Bored Gilligans Island GIF by TV Land Classic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...