Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely drafting a QB

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

I'd like to know how they plan to get into the 2nd. 

Every pick with have in this draft would get us about half way in value per the chart to the top of the 2nd round.   

giving up a player like Robby Anderson or trading away a pick next year. I really hope it's not the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

This. If it's pick 137 and we don't give up next year's pick to move up by all means draft a QB but I really don't want to lose more draft picks next year. If they would take Robbie Anderson to move up in this draft I would be interested but nobody is taking him for a second and I won't even start day dreaming on something impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Look at the trades yesterday. The trade ups largely haven't been super costly. We're not trading our 1st next year. I could see something like Robbie and a mid-rounder given the run on WRs yesterday and some good teams still borderline desperate at WR.

I would consider trading Robbie and a mid rounder to move up for Sam Howell or maybe even Carson Strong possibly but I don't think anybody really wants or cares about Robbie Anderson after his bad season last year unfortunately.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I know they weren’t but they all still involved a 1st rounder as part of them except for one that went two spots. We would be trading down to 33-45 from 137 and then just have 5ths+. That’s a way bigger jump than any of the other trades.

If you could trade Robby and a team values him then that’s great. I’m not that optimistic that he has that value. I’m solely talking about trading picks. That’s where if we need to move to the top of the 2nd then I think we’d have to use our 1st next year or our 2nd next year plus a few mid rounders.

I don't think we can make the move without a player being involved and Robby would be my bet.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

I would consider trading Robbie and a mid rounder to move up for Sam Howell or maybe even Carson Strong possibly but I don't think anybody really wants or cares about Robbie Anderson after his bad season last year unfortunately.

That's what I thought too but given that crazy run on WRs yesterday and multiple major trades for vet WRs I think he my have more value than I would've thought. There are still contenders like GB and KC who are borderline desperate at WR.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's what I thought too but given that crazy run on WRs yesterday and multiple major trades for vet WRs I think he my have more value than I would've thought. There are still contenders like GB and KC who are borderline desperate at WR.

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, davos said:

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

It makes sense to me for both sides if the right QB prospect is still available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

could be a player

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, davos said:

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

 Best scenario at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It makes sense to me for both sides if the right QB prospect is still available.

Right? I'm pretty darn confident we've got a top-12 line (playoff caliber) for him, better than he's ever had.  And with CMC (knock on wood) & DJ at his disposal, could make him feel like he's playing with Dynami and Javonte again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...