Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely drafting a QB

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

I'd like to know how they plan to get into the 2nd. 

Every pick with have in this draft would get us about half way in value per the chart to the top of the 2nd round.   

giving up a player like Robby Anderson or trading away a pick next year. I really hope it's not the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

This. If it's pick 137 and we don't give up next year's pick to move up by all means draft a QB but I really don't want to lose more draft picks next year. If they would take Robbie Anderson to move up in this draft I would be interested but nobody is taking him for a second and I won't even start day dreaming on something impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Look at the trades yesterday. The trade ups largely haven't been super costly. We're not trading our 1st next year. I could see something like Robbie and a mid-rounder given the run on WRs yesterday and some good teams still borderline desperate at WR.

I would consider trading Robbie and a mid rounder to move up for Sam Howell or maybe even Carson Strong possibly but I don't think anybody really wants or cares about Robbie Anderson after his bad season last year unfortunately.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I know they weren’t but they all still involved a 1st rounder as part of them except for one that went two spots. We would be trading down to 33-45 from 137 and then just have 5ths+. That’s a way bigger jump than any of the other trades.

If you could trade Robby and a team values him then that’s great. I’m not that optimistic that he has that value. I’m solely talking about trading picks. That’s where if we need to move to the top of the 2nd then I think we’d have to use our 1st next year or our 2nd next year plus a few mid rounders.

I don't think we can make the move without a player being involved and Robby would be my bet.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

I would consider trading Robbie and a mid rounder to move up for Sam Howell or maybe even Carson Strong possibly but I don't think anybody really wants or cares about Robbie Anderson after his bad season last year unfortunately.

That's what I thought too but given that crazy run on WRs yesterday and multiple major trades for vet WRs I think he my have more value than I would've thought. There are still contenders like GB and KC who are borderline desperate at WR.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's what I thought too but given that crazy run on WRs yesterday and multiple major trades for vet WRs I think he my have more value than I would've thought. There are still contenders like GB and KC who are borderline desperate at WR.

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, davos said:

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

It makes sense to me for both sides if the right QB prospect is still available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

could be a player

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, davos said:

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

 Best scenario at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It makes sense to me for both sides if the right QB prospect is still available.

Right? I'm pretty darn confident we've got a top-12 line (playoff caliber) for him, better than he's ever had.  And with CMC (knock on wood) & DJ at his disposal, could make him feel like he's playing with Dynami and Javonte again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • PNW_PantherMan
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...