Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral is here because of Ben McAdoo


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well okay then. He is your new OC and he should decide who he feels is the best to fit his system. Just glad that they all cleared out and let him choose of the QB's still available.

I guess now it's on him to teach the rook up.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zod said:

On the radio today, Fitterer said they deferred to McAdoo's judgement on QBs, and he had Corral as QB1 

Seems like a much smarter path than listening to Phil Snow 

Which furthers the assumption Rhule wanted Baker to repeat the scenario for a 3rd straight year.   

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 5
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jmac said:

Well okay then. He is your new OC and he should decide who he feels is the best to fit his system. Just glad that they all cleared out and let him choose of the QB's still available.

I guess now it's on him to teach the rook up.

That's the big thing. If he knows what he wants to do and who he wants to do it, then Rhule needs to let him. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, I was expecting to trade back, grab LT Penning from N Iowa or a Guard (and go with BC at LT), and then trade up into the early second round for the QB--expecting to get Howell or Corral. 
The only reason we waited is because we did not have the draft capital after taking Ewonu with no trade back.

The way they waited when 4 QBs were falling suggests to me that they did not have a single QB targeted--But to get Corral at the end of round 3?  That is a round and a half higher than where we got Clausen and about the same place where we drafted Grier.  NOT COMPARING THEM--but demonstrating the value.  It really does not matter where they were on our board, by the way, if they don't show up on the field.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Unless Canales has devised a crazy offensive philosophy  to allow Brycie to flourish, which there has never been a 5 10 qb to have done anything in an NFL,  it would be the first time in NFL history....the analytic odds suck and Dipper is an idiot for not abiding by something he touted from the beginning.... I'll watch our 6 win season without giving dipper a buck....         
    • Unless Brooks is Thomas Davis...he ain't coming back...2 years out of the league is going to be a rough return... if he can return to form..we could really have a good backfield.  We'll draft a RB in second round next year is my guess.....Etienne is a fumbler.
    • Sounds like they would rank him higher if he moved on from BY9.  I guess at least Dan wasn’t ranked 30th or something.  Okay I looked at it. After the first few obvious top established guys I don’t know what he is using for criteria. For instance the Jags guy, one season. Ranked 18. Just let Lloyd walk. Drafted that fatasy two way player that isn’t gonna be playing two ways.     And the Texans’ GM is at number 9 despite failing to put an OL around his young QB.    Ballard from the Colts? Didn’t he take Richardson at 4 or something? Gave up first round picks for CBs?    just for instance.   
×
×
  • Create New...