Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer "best players will play"


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s just really funny how people want to assign anything bad to Rhule and good to Fitterer, regardless if they say the same things. It’s pretty comical and while Hurney did blow donkey balls, it was the same with him. While we had plenty of proof, he was still the dumping ground for everything.

Basically Fitt can talk in a microphone/in front of people and doesn’t come off poorly. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

If you are in a situation where a FO is literally forcing players on a coach, it's time for someone to go.

Well yea he does need to go, Rhule still being here is inept but thats what the Panthers have been more often than not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Good lord you people have a pathological hatred of Rhule.

he's worked hard to earn that.

not a bit of the hate is undeserved. he's f*cked up at every level so much he's had to be corrected at almost every turn. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Good lord you people have a pathological hatred of Rhule.

I mean it's a hatred so deeply rooted and hitherto unknown to the people of this area...

...but destined to take the place of the mudshark in your mythology 🤣...

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Apparently in Rhules mind they were, or at least on that particular Sunday.  Hard to say as the starting 5 were never the same. 

Now we’re back to why people HATE Rhule.  He looks at that line last year and felt he nailed it.

Offseason additions are usually universally celebrated.  Fresh faces, new energy.  It all looks fun and exciting.

Trudging thru 18 weeks  looking like a new breed of horse turd each week won’t get you a lot of support.

 

Coaches that lose aren’t liked.

GMs have to miss on a few draft days and free agency periods to feel the heat.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Now we’re back to why people HATE Rhule.  He looks at that line last year and felt he nailed it.

Offseason additions are usually universally celebrated.  Fresh faces, new energy.  It all looks fun and exciting.

Trudging thru 18 weeks  looking like a new breed of horse turd each week won’t get you a lot of support.

Coaches that lose aren’t liked.

GMs have to miss on a few draft days and free agency periods to feel the heat.

Outside of his love for old Temple and Baylor guys (and the dumbass "short arms" thing) personnel hasn't been the primary issue.

The problem is that he still coaches like a college coach, and that just doesn't work at the pro level.

In order to believe that Rhule is going to be successful, you've gotta buy in to the idea that he can learn to be a pro coach.

For me, it's not just that I don't buy that idea. It's that I'm really not interested in employing a head coach who has to learn his job to the level that Rhule does.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I mean it's a hatred so deeply rooted and hitherto unknown to the people of this area...

...but destined to take the place of the mudshark in your mythology 🤣...

yeah, this is really fan fiction by Matt Rhule's board family though. 

There is no deep hatred for Matt Rhule.  Matt Rhule was simply a comically bad NFL HC last year.  Comically bad.  We just say that.  It was what it was.  Generally, when someone is that bad they disappear.  Matt Rhule hasn't.  Therefore, it keeps getting mentioned.   You know, being he is the HC and all and has his finger print on literally everything going forward. 

Jimmy Clausen sucked horrifically as QB.  There was no real Clausen hatred.  He just couldn't play QB. I think Clausen actually gained more respect as a person throughout his bad career.   But if Clausen would have been our starting QB in 2011 it would have been spoken about a lot. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...