Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We've made it to the bottom


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Shotgun said:

 

Look at the teams that were ranked 32nd in the preseason power rankings the last few years and you will see a trend. Those teams all had terrible seasons that year...maybe we'll buck the trend though.

Could you list exactly where the last 6 or 7 teams ranked #32 in the "power rankings" ended up finishing in the final standings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Could you list exactly where the last 6 or 7 teams ranked #32 in the "power rankings" ended up finishing in the final standings?

2021-Texans 4-13, 2020-Bengals 4-11-1, 2019-Jaguars 6-10

That's all I could find from ESPN. None of them finished 32 but none were very good

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Panthers Rhule said:

2021-Texans 4-13, 2020-Bengals 4-11-1, 2019-Jaguars 6-10

That's all I could find from ESPN. None of them finished 32 but none were very good

Yep, I doubt we finish last but there's a high probability we are picking  top 5 next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

They had the Bengals 28th last year.

2020 the WFT was 31st and went to the playoffs.

It's nothing to get excited about other than it gives the downers something to cheer about.

How did the 32nd ranked teams do those years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media has caught up to what the huddle could see coming two years ago. Before last season they were on Teppers nuts because of his $.

Now after all the wanton destruction they can see what we were screaming about, now we have all reached consensus that this franchise is mismanaged.

The roster on paper has been good enough but chimpanzees are running things, flinging poo at the walls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think teams get put in the 32nd place in any power rankings out of spite. 

Honestly, it's kind of a "usual suspects" thing. The same three or four teams are usually at that spot: Detroit, Jacksonville, NY Jets, Houston, the Giants... We seem to have joined that club but something is making the list makers think all of those teams have made more strides to improve than we have.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2022 at 10:58 PM, poundaway said:

The Huddle has largely gotten what it wanted in FA and the draft.  Two excellent FA linemen, a potential franchise LT at pick 6, a rookie QB with a chance to start, and it looks like Sam will probably be the starter, at least day one...so Rhule will sink or swim with Sam...at least at first.

For those hoping we crash and burn with Sam to fire Rhule and to get a high draft pick for a new QB, ESPN thinks we're well on our way.

I could give a rat-@ss about what ESPN gives us.  As far as I'm concerned ESPN is on the bottom of all sports broadcasting.  Hell the Bleacher Report is probably ahead of them.

Secondly, how are we 28th before Free Agency and now 32.  Makes no sense.  We've upgrade the O-line by leaps and bounds.  Drafted a possible franchise LT and got the best QB in the draft.  Yet we lose 4 spots.  Obviously ESPN didn't do their homework. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...