Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

This really confuses you... 🤦‍♂️🤣

Why a team would trade away 3 first rounds picks to replace their good 29 year old QB and why he is STILL available in late May? Yeah it’s not confusing, it’s because he is overpaid for a below average QB. No team is eager to trade away assets and take on his full contract. Similar to Baker right now. He is heading to his 3rd team by age 30 IF a team actually trades for him. Teddy 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Why a team would trade away 3 first rounds picks to replace their good 29 year old QB and why he is STILL available in late May? Yeah it’s not confusing, it’s because he is overpaid for a below average QB. No team is eager to trade away assets and take on his full contract. Similar to Baker right now. He is heading to his 3rd team by age 30 IF a team actually trades for him. Teddy 2.0

According to you, this is the same team that passed on Brady.  Now you think they're smart.  Make up your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, poundaway said:

According to you, this is the same team that passed on Brady.  Now you think they're smart.  Make up your mind.

They wanted to roll with Jimmy that year and after another year of letting them down they became eager to move on. It’s really not hard to follow. It obviously was the wrong move in hindsight just like Mitch to the bears. It doesn’t mean they are smart just they realized their mistake. They weren’t going to get any better with Jimmy at QB. We did it with Teddy and Sam. Teams chose the wrong QB all the time. Hell even the Jets did it with Sam and we traded for him. That turned out great… You on the other hand are wanting their mistake on our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh God....Baker?

Sizzlebuzz supporting Jimmy was likely to doom that scenario anyway 😄

Thing about Mayfield though is that we're not the only team reported to have interest in him.

As an aside, there's apparently a story that he and his wife recently visited somewhere in the general vicinity of Seattle. Mind you, that doesn't constitute a definitive connection to the Seahawks.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Or, they are continuing to make mistakes.    They overvalued Lance.

That doesn't mean moving on from Jimmy is the wrong move.  Lance is an unknown in which no team knows more about him than the Niners.  You have a strange notation that if a team makes one mistake they are destined to make mistakes over and over again.  I mean the Patriots made a mistake in not signing Brady what he thought he was worth right?  We made one in trading for Sam so I guess trading for Jimmy would be us continuing to make mistakes as well... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

Issa Rae Nod GIF by Insecure on HBO

You think the meeting point for panthers is if browns are paying 10 million from the 18.9?

You better be rockin a Baker jersey if this happens.......

welll the QB room would be special....special type of special....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan Alexander's comments on Garoppolo (from the article posted in the other thread)...

Garoppolo’s recent shoulder surgery, as well as his injury history, is a far greater concern for some within the organization. The Panthers want no part of his $26.9 million salary, and the 49ers haven’t shown a willingness to take to carry those payments in a trade.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...