Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alexander analyzes the upcoming season


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, throw them all out week 1....and I'd concede Baker is better than every QB named going in to week 1. 

But that doesn't make Baker a good QB.  Nor does playing him really serve a purpose outside of Rhule trying to squeak out the max possible wins.  I'd rather Rhule play whatever combo of his handpicked Sam/PJ to start off the year and see what Matt Corral has.  That will help us make decisions next offseason. 

No argument...

There are at least some hints in this and other articles that Ben McAdoo might be okay with that option as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

What does it mean? I haven’t hear anything regarding him looking better in team workouts. 

As far as I can tell in context, it means McAdoo thinks he looked a little better.

Way too early for that to translate into anything yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trueblade said:

I can't imagine think they will put that much stock into Sam looking good in shorts with no pass rush? 

Any statement made at this time of year is best taken with liberal amounts of sodium chloride.

It's basically just first impressions right now. Nobody really knows anything definitive yet.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I look at it, if Corral is going to struggle in his first year under center.  I would rather him do it this year than having to wait until 2023.  If Corral can execute the playbook.  Let him play.  Our line is much better so he won't be running for his life.

I still wish they would sign Cam as a backup.  He's much better than PJ and Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, trueblade said:

I can't imagine think they will put that much stock into Sam looking good in shorts with no pass rush? 

That's the biggest issue. I don't care how good sammy looks in practice or how much he seems to have improved there. if there's no bullets flying, we won't know.

i don't even care how well he does with an improved OL, because there's going to be times it collapses or he perceives it's collapsing or CMC is out or something isn't absolutely perfect and he's going to freak out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

As far as I can tell in context, it means McAdoo thinks he looked a little better.

Way too early for that to translate into anything yet.

Well they said the same thing last year so I will take it with a grain of salt. 
Practice is such a poor measuring stick for how good/improved a player is. 
Just look at how many UDFA camp MVPs the fans have crowned. Then the season begins and reality hits that player in the face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ted Ginn Jr.'s Hands said:

Given the QB's coming out in the 23 draft, we need to have an idea of what this kid can do by the end of the season, which is more of an opportunity than most 3rd round qb's get.  Play him early.

Short of him being OROY we should draft a QB next year no matter what.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Short of him being OROY we should draft a QB next year no matter what.  

I've said this numerous times myself.  We need more than one promising young qb to develop on this team.  Corral could be great but he could also be lost to injury and we have no backup plan.  I'm in the camp that you are always looking for a franchise qb even if you have one already. Those guys are rare and you don't want to be caught without one. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Whatever you have to pay these guys after a trade just pay Cam and save the fuging picks. Foles would have been another. 

I don't see and don't hope to see any draft picks lost for either of them.

The article mentions Newton...

The Panthers are open to signing quarterback Cam Newton, but he would not enter camp as the starter, and would have to agree to a smaller salary.

There's still been no indication Newton wants to play for Matt Rhule again, and the team's conditions don't exactly sound "ideal" for him.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Mayfield seems like the best, and most likely option over San Francisco’s Jimmy Garoppolo even if Panthers receiver Robbie Anderson isn’t thrilled with the idea of Mayfield coming to Charlotte.

 

...Does Robbie realize he is the Sam Darnold of wide receivers? Nobody gives a damn what you think....he acts like hes relevant. The day you are off this team is the day I uncork the Dom....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...