Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mini Camp news


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

All in all Ickey will be the starting LT once it's all said an done. 

 

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

I don't really have any doubt who will be LT but that bit about Christensen is still pretty maddening.

I am gonna give benefit of the doubt to coaches that absolutely don't deserve it but I have to assume this is largely BS and they are just prepping BC to go at LT in case Ikey gets injured. After all they did also say he was taking a bunch of reps at C too.

I think maybe this is much ado about nothing.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I still believe that Ekwonu is a day 1 LT starter. If that doesn't happen......Jesus.

He is strong in the run game and weak in the pass protect coming into the league. We have a bad QB, a rookie and a guy who should have trouble making a PS so not going with the best guy for our situation and who would become the overall best with time just makes too much sense for Rhule lol. 

Brady had zero push in his run game and our D is strong in their pass rush while being weak in run stopping so of course Brady is highlighted without any context or understanding...Rhule's MO at this point. 

Jesus Running GIF by Boo! A Madea Halloween

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaq said:

Minicamp news doesn’t mean much,  coaches rarely pencil in the rookie at a starter position this early. Which is  normally to motivate said rookie to work harder rather then have them think their being handed a role.

Yeah, we shouldn't freak out about this. If this was the story post-TC, there would be a big problem. 

I agree. This is probably a non-story.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...