Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mini Camp news


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

All in all Ickey will be the starting LT once it's all said an done. 

 

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

I don't really have any doubt who will be LT but that bit about Christensen is still pretty maddening.

I am gonna give benefit of the doubt to coaches that absolutely don't deserve it but I have to assume this is largely BS and they are just prepping BC to go at LT in case Ikey gets injured. After all they did also say he was taking a bunch of reps at C too.

I think maybe this is much ado about nothing.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I still believe that Ekwonu is a day 1 LT starter. If that doesn't happen......Jesus.

He is strong in the run game and weak in the pass protect coming into the league. We have a bad QB, a rookie and a guy who should have trouble making a PS so not going with the best guy for our situation and who would become the overall best with time just makes too much sense for Rhule lol. 

Brady had zero push in his run game and our D is strong in their pass rush while being weak in run stopping so of course Brady is highlighted without any context or understanding...Rhule's MO at this point. 

Jesus Running GIF by Boo! A Madea Halloween

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaq said:

Minicamp news doesn’t mean much,  coaches rarely pencil in the rookie at a starter position this early. Which is  normally to motivate said rookie to work harder rather then have them think their being handed a role.

Yeah, we shouldn't freak out about this. If this was the story post-TC, there would be a big problem. 

I agree. This is probably a non-story.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...