Sheena Quick on Baker Mayfield to Panthers trade

[SizzleBuzz]

5 hours ago, GOAT said:

8 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Isn't Sheena wrong more than she is correct?  It seems I have seen her aim and miss a lot.

yup her and that Nat007 girl just throw poo to the wall and see what sticks.

They are not alone...

..."local" no-sources crowd is thick .

Edited June 21, 2022 by SizzleBuzz

[CPF4LIFE]

Sheena was one of the first ones to report info of Cam coming back last year before it happened. She also has been adamant about Sam being done as the starter here since the season ended. I feel like people just try hard to hate her regardless instead of actually being reasonable about what she provides. Especially when she doesn't come off as unlikable at all to people who engage her. If you gotta problem with her its probably just something going on with you. 

[3838]

On 6/22/2022 at 5:12 AM, CPF4LIFE said:

Sheena was one of the first ones to report info of Cam coming back last year before it happened. She also has been adamant about Sam being done as the starter here since the season ended. I feel like people just try hard to hate her regardless instead of actually being reasonable about what she provides. Especially when she doesn't come off as unlikable at all to people who engage her. If you gotta problem with her its probably just something going on with you. 

[top dawg]

I find some of the responses in this thread ludicrous regarding Sheena Quick, as it was simply an update. No more, no less. 

I also find it ludicrous that it appears like some people think that good journalism, not that Twitter is necessarily that or journalism at all, begins and ends with breaking a story (or simply guessing correctly). But, whatever.

[cookinbrak]

An update would imply that something had changed.

[TheSpecialJuan]

 

[trueblade]

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

[ForJimmy]

11 minutes ago, trueblade said:

It would be good, BUT that means we are going to be bidding with ourselves for Jimmy G…. Here comes the “Niners are will to play Jimmy this year” rumors to boost his value up.

[trueblade]

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

It would be good, BUT that means we are going to be bidding with ourselves for Jimmy G…. Here comes the “Niners are will to play Jimmy this year” rumors to boost his value up.

Let them keep Jimmy G. He needs a team to elevate him. He doesn't elevate a team.

Sam for a few games, then see what the rookie's got. Throw in a game or two for Never Lost Walker. These are the QBs hand picked by Rhule. Let him ride or die with them.

 

[Mr. Scot]

40 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It would be good, BUT that means we are going to be bidding with ourselves for Jimmy G…. Here comes the “Niners are will to play Jimmy this year” rumors to boost his value up.

Pretty sure that source is bullsh-t.

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

I don't believe they are overly interested in either but being the only bidder is obviously the best scenario. Multiple bidders increases the price. You ever used ebay?

 

We were the only bidder for Sam. That’s a red flag IMO. If an actually talented QB was available there would be multiple bidders. 

[kungfoodude]

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

I don't believe they are overly interested in either but being the only bidder is obviously the best scenario. Multiple bidders increases the price. You ever used ebay?

 

Remember when we were the only bidder for Sam Darnold?

That only works if you don't do something stupid.

[ForJimmy]

59 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Remember when we were the only bidder for Sam Darnold?

That only works if you don't do something stupid.

Yep. We aren’t smart enough to handle being the only bidder correctly. You have to be 100% ready to walk away from the deal and not panic. 
I will say we appear to be doing ok with the Baker rumors so far. 

[Donald LaFell]

I hated John Fox never trying to find a QB but if we keep grabbing at every QB that hits the market we’re gonna suck for a long time.