Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have seen nothing that makes me think Mayfield is ever going to be anything other than mediocre, but I don't hate this deal and you just never know. Maybe a change of scenery and getting out of Cleveland will be the spark he needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

Ever hear 3rd times a charm? Fact is we have to keep swingin on QBs, thats the reality. 

We literally just fuging drafted one in the 3rd, one that we supposedly had a first round grade on.  We are not magically going to make mayfield a franchise qb, it just aint happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boxhead85 said:

I wouldn't say waste just yet. 5 million + 5th rounder is not a big investment in a QB, especially on the last year of his deal. We'll see what this upcoming season brings and re-visit next offseason.

That's short term thinking.

So after this year, you either have to extend Baker for starting QB money, or you have to go into 2023 with Corral as essentially a rookie after getting very few reps in 2022. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boxhead85 said:

I wouldn't say waste just yet. 5 million + 5th rounder is not a big investment in a QB, especially on the last year of his deal. We'll see what this upcoming season brings and re-visit next offseason.

Thats just creating more headaches and pissing away more draft picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

C’mon, we are only paying that because the Browns covered $10.5M and Mayfield knew we were one of two places he could be the starter.

Darnold wasn’t a threat to developing Corral. Mayfield absolutely is. He’s not here to help Corral at all, he’s here for the next deal.

I was excited for this year to see Corral and the new OL. Now, not as much. We’ll be more competitive but unless Baker makes a huge turnaround, we very likely will have zero clue what we have in Corral which is not smart going into the supposedly good 2023 QB draft.

Corall starting this year would be pure desperation, he’s a third round rookie qb. Unless he is a miracle then we would just be giving up this year, our team is talented enough for the playoffs. Baker is the best qb we’ve had in the past 5 years. Also, our staff gets to watch Corall in camp and gets a year with him so they would be much more educated then us if he’s ready or not.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yea that's honestly what I'm most concerned about.  It's the opportunity cost of playing Mayfield for a season, and perhaps not seeing what we have in Corral at all.

It gives them the opportunity to pivot later. Hopefully Baker works out and it solves itself all together. Better than Sam sucking for two games and then throwing an underdeveloped Corral out there to salvage the season. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...