Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ITS HAPPENING! BLACK HELMETS CONFIRMED!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

 

 

It looks good on the Ravens and Falcons because they have colors that go well with it. Those photo shops demonstrate the color scheme doesn't work in my opinion. 

Though not a hill I care to die on. Just my honest opinion.

So red and purple go with black and blue doesn't?  I think most colors work with it...  Our jerseys are already blue/black.  If you don't like it though that's your opinion.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Hard disagree. The silver is dated and looks like crap with the rest of the uniform. Black helmet immediately improves the look of each uniform combo. 

Are the Packers dated?

Cowboys?

Steelers?

Giants?

Colts?

 

How about Penn st

Michigan 

USC?

Alabama?

Cubs?

Yankees?

Red Sox?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Are the Packers dated?

Cowboys?

Steelers?

Giants?

Colts?

 

How about Penn st

Michigan 

USC?

Alabama?

Cubs?

Yankees?

Red Sox?

You realize several of these teams have had refreshed looks?  Especially the Cowboys...

https://www.nfl.com/photos/cowboys-uniforms-through-the-years-0ap3000000815354#a438e4ec-669c-441e-885c-e475bc66fb0c

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Because like iconic teams across all sports you shouldn't change your uniform. 

Don't change. Just win.

We're a long way from "iconic" 😕

Changes to uniform aesthetics don't bother me. I could see some level of annoyance if they were changing a longtime logo or something like that (though I thought our logo change was an improvement) but changing a color scheme, moving a stripe, switching a font or some such? Not a big deal to me. Add in that for the moment, it's just one game anyway.

Heck, if teams never made changes, Cincinnati would still be stuck with those ugly helmets that had the word "BENGALS" on the side rather than the tiger stripes.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...