Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ITS HAPPENING! BLACK HELMETS CONFIRMED!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

 

 

It looks good on the Ravens and Falcons because they have colors that go well with it. Those photo shops demonstrate the color scheme doesn't work in my opinion. 

Though not a hill I care to die on. Just my honest opinion.

So red and purple go with black and blue doesn't?  I think most colors work with it...  Our jerseys are already blue/black.  If you don't like it though that's your opinion.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Hard disagree. The silver is dated and looks like crap with the rest of the uniform. Black helmet immediately improves the look of each uniform combo. 

Are the Packers dated?

Cowboys?

Steelers?

Giants?

Colts?

 

How about Penn st

Michigan 

USC?

Alabama?

Cubs?

Yankees?

Red Sox?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Are the Packers dated?

Cowboys?

Steelers?

Giants?

Colts?

 

How about Penn st

Michigan 

USC?

Alabama?

Cubs?

Yankees?

Red Sox?

You realize several of these teams have had refreshed looks?  Especially the Cowboys...

https://www.nfl.com/photos/cowboys-uniforms-through-the-years-0ap3000000815354#a438e4ec-669c-441e-885c-e475bc66fb0c

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Because like iconic teams across all sports you shouldn't change your uniform. 

Don't change. Just win.

We're a long way from "iconic" 😕

Changes to uniform aesthetics don't bother me. I could see some level of annoyance if they were changing a longtime logo or something like that (though I thought our logo change was an improvement) but changing a color scheme, moving a stripe, switching a font or some such? Not a big deal to me. Add in that for the moment, it's just one game anyway.

Heck, if teams never made changes, Cincinnati would still be stuck with those ugly helmets that had the word "BENGALS" on the side rather than the tiger stripes.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I need to actually do a full analysis but I think the issue was more that we'd rarely have top-to-bottom awesome drafts but we'd frequently have drafts where only 2-3 players panned out, but the 1st is a Pro Bowler and the other two solid starters or backups. We rarely had drafts where only 1 player was good, and we never had absolute useless drafts. At the very least we always had one really, really good guy. The worst was probably 2005 where we got Thomas Davis (Hall of Honor-quality player) and Geoff Hangartener. Evan Mathis was good, but only after he left.
    • Hurney wasn’t good with contracts but I think he was probably above average at drafting.  Not saying he was great.  Just that most draft classes are worthless.
    • Ehh, teams earlier this season double and tripled teamed him with decent success. The reason he beasted out so much with Miami was for some reason they did not much at all. Bad call on their part. But that is his purpose. If he is eating up people that is huge, and theoretically should give others the ability to make a play. But his surrounding cast to do that isn’t great. Brown is something OCs have to put a lot of time to plan for.
×
×
  • Create New...