Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR


Floppin
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

When he does something worth getting excited over, I'll get excited. 

As long as he keeps making boneheaded moves, I'll keep saying he's not an NFL caliber coach and never has been. And there has been no shortage of them because I even when so far as to list 15 of them in another thread that the Huddle called moronic when they happened, and were right. I could have listed more, but it really didn't feel necessary to just keep piling on. 

Understandable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I'll rephrase.  His career as a starter here is more then likely kaput

Did they specify if he's immediately going on IR or are they going to get him on the 53 and then IR him? I know with a lisfranc he probably can't be ready to practice by the end of the season but are there meeting room limitations if they IR him before 53 man cuts? I feel like guys IR'd that early are relegated to rehab and the weight room

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Did they specify if he's immediately going on IR or are they going to get him on the 53 and then IR him? I know with a lisfranc he probably can't be ready to practice by the end of the season but are there meeting room limitations if they IR him before 53 man cuts? I feel like guys IR'd that early are relegated to rehab and the weight room

I read some articles on lisfranc, and best case scenario is he is out a minimum of six to eight weeks.  But more likely 6-11 months.  Probably out for the year, but I suppose we will learn more later.    

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I read some articles on lisfranc, and best case scenario is he is out a minimum of six to eight weeks.  But more likely 6-11 months.  Probably out for the year, but I suppose we will learn more later.    

yeah 6-12 weeks to walk. To get back to NFL shape probably a year, Cam had the same thing. He got slower in general but didn't seem to affect his comfort level, probably a mix of age/weight etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alot of people on this board dont seem to understand that all Rhule cares about is this year and what gives him the best chance to keep his job. That is solely on Baker. It makes perfect sense for Rhule to focus more on that then trying to develop Corral who 1) is a 3rd round rookie and 2) not saving his job if Corral needs to play. 

 

You guys need a serious lesson is expectation management and being able to logically understand situations 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Paa Langfart said:

Nipe I mispoke Cam had a lisfranc - unsuprisingly also against the Pats in a preseason game

 

fncking pats.  After they injure Cam in preseason, they bring him in and run him into the ground more than RR did.  Then they release him after training camp right before the season starts.

sleaze, just up and down, sleaze.

cheating fncks

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...