Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker be starting


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Poor CRA is now 0 for 48 in his offseason predictions.

Good.  The bar for Matt Rhule is literally laying on the ground and he managed to step over it on this one. 

I mean my kid could of taken care of this mind boggling dilemma for him the day Baker was signed 

Rhule fanboys high-stepping like Deion Sanders because Matt Rhule shockingly was able to tie his shoelaces.   I’d be happy if Rhule keeps proving me wrong but the fact this thread even had to exist makes me doubt that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I'm going to go with, "Matt Corrall would be the next Tom Brady if he had 8 more training camp reps!!"

Or.....If three QBs with no NFL future weren't being stockpiled ahead of him by an amateur athletics coach he wouldn't have been the least prepared for full speed reps and would have chemistry with receivers who will actually be playing football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rippadonn said:

I've been bant here twice for the same. I pitched a fit because I knew Teddy B wasn't a good enough QB to get us anywhere. Baker, same.

This dude has been banned countless times for the same thing...trying to apply numerology to predict outcomes of the Panthers' fortunes.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Poor CRA is now 0 for 48 in his offseason predictions.

I think that's why he and Linville Gorge are so invested in Matt Rhule failing. It's their chance to finally be right about SOMETHING!

I kid because I love. CRA is right about stuff every now and then. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can see Cooper being a target. Wouldn’t be bent out of shape but obviously not a preference if we’re talking position picked — but I’m just looking for impact. And man, this draft class is an odd bunch in our range. Has these really talented hybrid Slot/Safeties, McDonald (but I think I liked Tyleik more the other year), Faulk (huge work in progress), Saddiq (TE in R1?), and some interesting but wildly different profiling OTs. Our biggest needs: ILB, 3-4 DE, S/Slot (à la Branch), OT, WR, and TE The WRs here would be a notable impact add.  I personally don’t have a position I am pining for. I see Thieneman, Cooper, McDonald, and McNeil-Warren as my faves right now but it could change.  Iheanachor is a sleeper at OT over Proctor, Miller and others. A big eye-of-the-beholder year. It would take a major reach for me to be ticked with the pick bc there’s just too big a range of players, positions and types this draft. Unpopular: Honestly, I kind of love the idea of just trading up for Styles if he slips to 8/9. It’s not a year where capital is going to be lofty.     
    • I have wanted to do that since I first looked at the draft order and the crop of players.  A lot of it is, just not that impressed with the selection we are likely to have at 19. And then when I learned how good some of these ILBs are I never bought that we could sit at 51 and get one. So trading back helps us have a chance to move up for one of those guys. 
    • I would pass, dude is 30 and would require using a draft pick to get.  Maybe if we were in season and having a better year than expected and see the need for a CB, but right now no. 
×
×
  • Create New...