Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: best & worst vs Bills


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Burris, Deonte Brown might struggle to get a spot.  I was a bit disappointed by Cade Mays, but--very much like BC--they are playing him at one position one week, another the following week.  That has to be confusing. I am of the mindset that you develop a player at one position and then you expose him to another.  But I am no Matt Rhule.

It does seem as though the OL depth is becoming clear---Mays, Jordan, Elf (he is not starting over Bozeman) and maybe Erving---but I am not sure I would keep Erving.   He reminds me of the Marty Hurney method of self promotion---overpay an average player in hopes that plays up to the contract.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Burris, Deonte Brown might struggle to get a spot.  I was a bit disappointed by Cade Mays, but--very much like BC--they are playing him at one position one week, another the following week.  That has to be confusing. I am of the mindset that you develop a player at one position and then you expose him to another.  But I am no Matt Rhule.

It does seem as though the OL depth is becoming clear---Mays, Jordan, Elf (he is not starting over Bozeman) and maybe Erving---but I am not sure I would keep Erving.   He reminds me of the Marty Hurney method of self promotion---overpay an average player in hopes that plays up to the contract.

 

The only thing that's going to get rid of Erving is the Rhule Curse [Does anyone need explanation?], but Irving seems like he's immune to it. Rhule genuinely seems to value Erving as a lineman. "He's so athletic! He can play any position..."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

The only thing that's going to get rid of Erving is the Rhule Curse [Does anyone need explanation?], but Irving seems like he's immune to it. Rhule genuinely seems to value Erving as a lineman. "He's so athletic! He can play any position..."

I will never understand the infatuation Rhule had or has with him. It defies all logic and reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChuckWag78 said:

"-Poor Sam"

This was my thought exactly when I saw the scores. 

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a QB drafted that high try hard but still suck. Unlike most high drafted busts it’s not laziness or injury that killed his career, he just doesn’t have the intangibles you want in a QB much less as a team leader. He’s basically the living form of “Bad Luck Brian”.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Riverboat Ron said:

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a QB drafted that high try hard but still suck. Unlike most high drafted busts it’s not laziness or injury that killed his career, he just doesn’t have the intangibles you want in a QB much less as a team leader. He’s basically the living form of “Bad Luck Brian”.

He is so ill-suited to being an NFL QB that you wonder how anyone scouted him and didn't pick up on it?

It's wild.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...