Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trade for wide receiver Laviska Shenault


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I still don’t see what we sent for him. 

Quote

The Jaguars traded Shenault to the Carolina Panthers on Monday in exchange for a 2023 seventh-round draft pick and a 2024 sixth-round selection, NFL Network Insiders Ian Rapoport and Tom Pelissero reported.

The Panthers announced they sent undisclosed draft compensation to Jacksonville in the deal.

https://www.nfl.com/news/panthers-acquire-wr-laviska-shenault-from-jaguars-in-trade

I edited the first post to show this as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

NFL. com confirms

The Jaguars traded Shenault to the Carolina Panthers on Monday in exchange for a 2023 seventh-round draft pick and a 2024 sixth-round selection, NFL Network Insiders Ian Rapoport and Tom Pelissero reported.

 

Panthers acquire WR Laviska Shenault from Jaguars in trade (nfl.com)

 

I think that's a nice trade. I'm starting to like Jax. They can keep trading us their top picks for late rounders all day.

 

That just tells me Jacksonville knows exactly what they’re sending our way, and it isn’t much. 
 

I predict that we’ll barely know the guy is on our roster halfway through the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

That just tells me Jacksonville knows exactly what they’re sending our way, and it isn’t much. 

I predict that we’ll barely know the guy is on our roster halfway through the season. 

Are you changing your screen name to "The General"? 🤔

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

That just tells me Jacksonville knows exactly what they’re sending our way, and it isn’t much. 
 

I predict that we’ll barely know the guy is on our roster halfway through the season. 

Then you should feel the same way about us sending Daley to the Titans, and we got more in return than the Shenault trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

That just tells me Jacksonville knows exactly what they’re sending our way, and it isn’t much. 
 

I predict that we’ll barely know the guy is on our roster halfway through the season. 

McAdoo coached him at Jax and he had over 300 yds and 5 tds. I think he knows what we're getting and how to use him correctly because he's done it before. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...