Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is anyone here not waving the white flag?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes we lost our annual “revenge game” and yes we looked pretty bad in spots but the team showed heart and it came down to a BS RTP call for the Browns to win. 
 

I’m not giving up on the season after one game. I’m hoping that the staff can get things straightened out and we can beat a Giants team that without question we should beat. 
 

All bets are off if we suck against the Giants next week.

Edited by mc52beast
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, just like we should have "without question" beat them last year right?

We have THE worst HC in the league. We just lost to the fuggin Brissett lead Browns, down to their THIRD RT, and we were at home.................and still fuggin lost. Browns haven't won an opening game since 2004. We just lost to that. There's no hope bruh.

Edited by Castavar
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We played like absolute garbage, couldn’t stop the run, and still came within a kicker kicking a 58 yard fg of winning. 
 

We’re exactly what I thought we were. A 6-7 win team that could go to 8-9 with decent oline play. 
 

We’re gonna win some games this year but we’re also gonna have some unwatchable games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell no. Here's what I saw today: the Browns are strongest where we are weakest.

The Browns have an incredibly strong rushing attack, and our Run D is weak.

The Browns have an incredibly strong pass rush, and we're staring a rookie at LT.

 

Ickey looked raw, but going up against Myles Garrett in your first regular season action is a very tall order. Honestly, until we play the Rams and Aaron Donald, I don't think we're facing a pass rush the likes of which we saw today. And by that point, Ickey will be a salty veteran by comparison.

Similarly, I'm not sure we're going to face a two-headed rushing attack like we dealt with today. I don't know what Nick Chubb is covered in, but they should bottle it and it would outsell KY jelly.

 

I saw a lot of fight in the team today, and I wouldn't throw in the towel after 1 week.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...