Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Positives from Today


OnlyPantherFaninMaine
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jackson113 said:

Offense looked like it clicked after a while, maybe needed more reps together, like I said earlier..

 

 

They don't need no stinking reps.  What we need is more competition for who starts next week. 

They scored 17 points in the 4th, and may well have scored 20 or 22 and sealed the deal had they been allowed to.

I'm not sure, but I think we made something called adjustments.  I can't be sure because we haven't seen anything like that in, well, years.  Last year, we responded to similar situations by blank stares and mumbling the process is working.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

None. We arent making the playoffs for the billionith year.  It’s over after week 1.   This is legit one of those games where I sit back and said the coaching held us back. The insanely misuse of McCaffrey in the first half. 4 touches???  One minute 38 seconds and we run 3 Straight Draw Plays to be conservative?  Fat fhule calling a time out to gift the browns field goal? This is year three and limp dick rookie head coach stuff is still happening.  

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

None. We arent making the playoffs for the billionith year.  It’s over after week 1.   This is legit one of those games where I sit back and said the coaching held us back. The insanely misuse of McCaffrey in the first half. 4 touches???  One minute 38 seconds and we run 3 Straight Draw Plays to be conservative?  Fat fhule calling a time out to gift the browns field goal? This is year three and limp dick rookie head coach stuff is still happening.  

Baby Thank You GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SingleMalt said:

LMAO….then you missed everything Francis

I'm not bothered. I expect to have plenty of chances to be disappointed by a team who "doesn't quit" but still manages to lose because they aren't built or managed to compete against average - good teams.

 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

McCaffrey came out unscathed even though the coaching staff stupidly had him go airborne for a TD instead of using that big bruising back that they acquired in the offseason.

Oh, and Xavier Woods, I thought he played well.

I think I speak for all CMC fantasy owners when I say, you shut your filthy mouth!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...