Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We improved the staff, so WTF is going on?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

The team has looked completely unprepared for the first halves of both of the last two games. No one here can pinpoint exactly why because we’re not in those practices and not in that locker room day-in and out. That said, we can judge the result and it seems like sporadic talent is the only thing keeping this team competitive at this point. The game plans have been crazy limited. Not sure we even have a go to for third and long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

The guy that shouldve been DROY at LB, Rhule has dropping back deep. This alone should get him fired.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

That is fuging insane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

That usage of Chinn is just mind-boggling. What a waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

That Cody twitter thread is feeling more and more believable 

I didnt believe it in its entirety, but definitely felt the majority of it was true, and all of it was likely rooted in truth but may have been a bit embellished...  now?  I agree, all of it seems more and more concrete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I didnt believe it in its entirety, but definitely felt the majority of it was true, and all of it was likely rooted in truth but may have been a bit embellished...  now?  I agree, all of it seems more and more concrete.

yeah Cody is kind of a dumbass and has a flare for the dramatic, but they've had a youtube show for like 10 years and never claim to have sources or anything so at the least I think they believe whoever told them that story. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...