Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bakerfield and batted balls


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

I initially saw BM listed at 5'10 but he is listed as 6'1" the same a Brees and my hero Johnny U.  Who didn't seem to have as many batted balls. 

How the hell is he getting so many batted balls.  I can understand some pressure is causes them, but it seems he has more than his fair share.

Is it team recognize that BM doesn't get much height off his out passes.  

I hope our tape review team can give a bit more insight. 

 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

don't think height is issue; look at drew Brees and Russell Wilson

cam had a lot of throws batted down also

Yeah its more arm angle and release point than height.  Murray is a damn midget and he doesnt get many. Cam is 6'5" and he had the most in the league. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers cannot overcome any loss of down plays with the current offensive juggernaut......

Word is out-jump in bakers throwing lanes.

OLmen need to punch the jumpers in the gut.

Baker needs to adapt some, maybe add a pump fake or two 

fuging call some plays that allow Baker to roll out in open space, one of his strengths....

vhdgzfbrjgnagviobl vab igfowiv

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I've said this a million times.

 

It's the Olines job to get their hands down.

When the defender jumps you punch towards his balls. They will instinctively bring their hands down in a flinch.

Or they jump and you cut them (unless this is now illegal but it shouldn't be in the free blocking zone) that brings their hands down as well.

 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, on a per-pass level, Mayfield's 2.46 percent passes batted down mark is the second-highest rate in the league among the 30 quarterbacks that have attempted at least 1,000 passes since 2018. The only quarterback with a higher percentage over that span is 6'5" Cam Newton at 2.56 percent.

ESPN

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years, with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...