Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great Podcast with Jonathan Stewart


d-dave
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

He said that? When?

 

Was this part of that “Snow runs the show and Rhule is his puppet” Twitter thread?

There is no way he said that to a legit source.  Even if he believed it he wouldn't want the players knowing it.  Also why would he take this job knowing that??  Surely he researched the team before he took the job.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Burnout189 said:

The coaches evaluate the talent and the game plan for each week. It's up to the players to execute that game plan to the best of their ability. But if the game plan sucks to begin with, not to mention the talent level of the players being put out there by the coaches to execute said plan is severely lacking, then well, you're gonna have a bad time.

And if you have a bunch of young players trying to learn the NFL game from coaches who don’t know the NFL game then…..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I listen to Locked On occasionally but the host is, or was(?), a Rhule supporter so listening to him can sometimes be a frustration. 
Dude constantly makes excuses for Rhule. 
 

That is laughable. He is always very open to not truly believing in Rhule. He, unlike you and others, bring up points that are beyond his control, and a view point that regardless that he feels like Rhule is gone no.matter what, that Rhule should have through to the end of season, which is what a patient perspective is. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

That is laughable. He is always very open to not truly believing in Rhule. He, unlike you and others, bring up points that are beyond his control, and a view point that regardless that he feels like Rhule is gone no.matter what, that Rhule should have through to the end of season, which is what a patient perspective is. 

Not from what I have heard from listening to him. 
He makes constant excuses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that execution is on the coaches. If they can't find the right people. It's on the coaches. If things break down it's on the coaches. Yes players have to make it work but if you can't get them to do that and hold players accountable you're not a good coach. Both Rivera and Fox always had a defense that would battle and was prepared. It's because of their background and understanding what needed to happen to win on defense. The problem was they both needed a OC that was just as good and the understanding of how to control the game as a HC. The sheer fact that Matt Rhule has traded for all these second tier QBs shows how he doesn't understand the NFL. You have to have a starting QB to win games and make the playoffs. It's not a maybe it's a yes we need that. But at the same time you have to have the coaching ability to develop that player too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lack of identity?  That is 1000% on the coaches.  (And JStew is right)

Players not sure of their assignment?  That's on the coaches.  (Once again, correct)

Even the part about needing that veteran leadership?  That's on the coaches and FO staff.  (Yep again)

I understand the coaches can't play the game for the players, but when so many things are wrong, it does need to go back to the person in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

There is no way he said that to a legit source.  Even if he believed it he wouldn't want the players knowing it.  Also why would he take this job knowing that??  Surely he researched the team before he took the job.

I read that entire thread from C3 and don't remember any mention of Wilks saying anything like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...