Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Orlovsky on the Panthers


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Quarterback is not our problem.  Teams with lesser QB's are finding ways to win.  The Falcons put up 27 on the Rams with Marcus Mariota at QB.  The Cowboys score 20 with Cooper Rush.  The Browns scored 30 with Brissett.

Honestly tired of the excuse that QB is our problem.  Rivera won five games with Kyle freaking Allen as his starting QB.  I'm not saying we're going deep in the playoffs with Baker as our QB.  I'm not sure Baker is the guy.  But he's not the reason we are where we are.

 

Yeah, all those batted balls haven't affected the game, nor missing wide open receivers (which he did in Cleveland), or the fact that he simply bails from the pocket immediately...that has nothing to do with us being where we are.

Baker may not be the only problem, but he's definitely a problem.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

The OC version was under a long time offensive HC.  That was one of the most over the top micromanagers in coaching.  

as HC McAdoo actually got to do whatever he wanted with the O.  And it was horrific. 

I also think it is framed poorly to call those career years for Manning.   They weren’t really career years.  They sucked and couldn’t win.  And Manning har to pass all game because they sucked and were always trying to comeback.

 

Ok, yeah fair point, but they were career years in the sense that he set career highs in passing yards and passing touchdowns.  But damn, I just went back and looked at Elis stats, and he threw a poo ton of INTs some years.  He had 3 seasons with more than 20 picks, and 2 with more than 25.  27 is his career high.  Yikes.  But yeah, McAdoo ain't hitting on poo so far with this offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luciu5 said:

I dont' think anyone is really suggesting. I think it's more predicting that's what we do.

Example:

Quote

I want Sam back.. No I’m not joking or being sarcastic. He has more extensive knowledge of the playbook and we have a healthy cmc and slightly better O line than last year. Bet anything Sam will be starting next Sunday 

 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

I don't understand what McAdoo is doing with Moore and CMC.  It's bewildering how ineffective he's made them.  Brady at least had plays built into his rather bland playbook that were tailored to get them space and work with their strengths. 

If anything, I think Brady may have had the right idea but it was way too simplified and easily figured out.

McAdoo just has the wrong idea.

He has been very underwhelming so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, hepcat said:

Or the fact is Rhule's a college coach and can't handle a complex offense so he's hired simplistic offensive coordinators

I would say that what Rhule does really doesn't effect offensive or Defense. He really doesn't have experience in either. It's probably why we have a big 10 DC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean,  McAdoo was literally run out of the league from calling plays for being painfully predictable and unimaginative on offense. 

Fair odds it’s largely just McAdoo being McAdoo.   And Rhule being Rhule.  It’s not a good combo given what we know of the two 

I would bet money on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Yeah, all those batted balls haven't affected the game, nor missing wide open receivers (which he did in Cleveland), or the fact that he simply bails from the pocket immediately...that has nothing to do with us being where we are.

Baker may not be the only problem, but he's definitely a problem.

He's just another Teddy, Sam, Cam/Sam, scapegoats for a coach who knows he's out of his league. He didn't even try to groom his own rookie QB to start in the NFL. He went full retread.

You never go full retread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://x.com/4thand1show/status/1975274357174784272?s=46   saw this this morning and came to post something similar. I didn’t just love the team or the wins, I loved those dudes man. They put everything they had out there every Sunday. You didn’t see a rep where anybody on that field was low effort in that era, and if you did they were quickly sent packing. 
    • …is Brycen Tremayne with 108 yards. Not sure what that tells us but I imagine it’s some sort of gumbo consisting of the following: - Bryce can’t push the ball downfield  - contrary to what many were saying this offseason, the wr still needs a lot of work.  - we need Coker back badly.  - Brycen is pretty good! Congrats to that young man! Curious to hear other’s read on it. Was a pretty surprised to see he had more yards than anyone other than Tet and thought that was symptomatic of our issues on offense. 
    • I don’t think many fans would have guessed the Chiefs and Ravens would be where they are right now. Same goes for some surprise packages like the Colts, I’m not sure many would have put money on them being top of their division after five weeks. It’ll be interesting to see if this continues!   Not necessarily. The Chargers have lost both starting OL and their 1st and 2nd choice RBs. They fell apart against Washington. The Broncos have just beat the Eagles, so they’d be my favourite in that division, but they are still only one win ahead of the Chiefs. All the Chiefs need is a couple of results to go their way and they’ll be right in the fight for the AFC East. I think that division is going to be very close and probably not a 12 or 13 win division like predicted. Unless of course the Broncos kick on.
×
×
  • Create New...