Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Orlovsky on the Panthers


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Are they talking about the OC version or the head coach version?

The OC version got a lot of praise. The head coach? Not so much.

I am thinking that Rhule has a big say in what kinds of plays we run. Our offense has looked basically the same under 3 different OCs the only common factor is Matt Rhule. 

Its like we are running a high school/small college scheme in the NFL. It is incredibly easy to diagnose and shutdown. Same routes and concepts all game, he might be using the coach madden suggestions to run his O. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snake said:

The fact that Mayfield didn't get a ton of time to study the playbook may very well be the cause of this. As the season goes on it should change. If it doesn't ooof.

I mean,  McAdoo was literally run out of the league from calling plays for being painfully predictable and unimaginative on offense. 

Fair odds it’s largely just McAdoo being McAdoo.   And Rhule being Rhule.  It’s not a good combo given what we know of the two 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

I remember Gianta offenses were pretty stagnant under McAdoo, with Eli Manning as QB.  not sure why we expected anything different   
 

 

That must have been when he was HC, not OC.  Because when he was OC they did not have any trouble moving the ball, especially thru the air.  Manning had career years both years McAdoo was the Giants OC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Are they talking about the OC version or the head coach version?

The OC version got a lot of praise. The head coach? Not so much.

Both. They tend to give Manning all the credit. I’ll wait for someone to dig into past game film to see if this is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, joemac said:

That must have been when he was HC, not OC.  Because when he was OC they did not have any trouble moving the ball, especially thru the air.  Manning had career years both years McAdoo was the Giants OC.

The OC version was under a long time offensive HC.  That was one of the most over the top micromanagers in coaching.  

as HC McAdoo actually got to do whatever he wanted with the O.  And it was horrific. 

I also think it is framed poorly to call those career years for Manning.   They weren’t really career years.  They sucked and couldn’t win.  And Manning har to pass all game because they sucked and were always trying to comeback.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I knew he was hedging for a raise.  
    • I definitely respect your opinion more than Tracy McGrady, Vince Carter, and Carmelo Anthony (whom I just watched on their show, all saying NOBODY wants to get the Hornets in the post-season). You win.
    • For all the good feelings about Bryce Young, when you read between the lines, it's what DC says and doesn't say that makes us know that Bryce hasn't necessarily been the supercomputer that they thought he would be. This season, Bryce has to make a tangible progression on the field. "A big part of it is being able to operate at the line of scrimmage — not in the huddle — when we want to, and he’s certainly capable of that," Canales said about Young. "It’s not solely on him. It’s a group that’s pretty young. You have to trust all the guys to go up there, communicate verbally or nonverbally and execute what we’re doing. We’ve made huge strides in that regard. His ability to alter things based on what they’re giving you will give us another edge, which he’s continued to grow and had some great examples down the stretch where he identified things they were doing, got us to the right check and capitalized on some plays. Want to see him do that more when it’s appropriate. We don’t need to be changing things just to change it." The implications, perhaps insinuations, are pretty evident. Bryce is just going to have to do better. "And then for Bryce, it’s the identification of early on the cues that the defense are giving us, to be able to eliminate parts of your progression before the ball’s even snapped. That happens with time. I’ve seen quarterbacks really own and master, which allows them to play lightning fast." Obviously Bryce isn't necessarily picking things up as fast as Canales would like, and I can only assume that Canales is making comparisons to Russell Wilson, Geno Smith and Baker Mayfield. But, of course, not everyone picks things up at the same rate. Bryce's pace has left Canales wanting for more. During the coming season, I don't believe that it will be good enough for Bryce to start putting things together in December, evidence of the light switch being on is going to have to show itself in September. Basically, it's really the moment that we've all been waiting for, the one that we thought should've happened earlier, the one that brings Bryce's accountability in the spotlight. On an off note, perhaps to that end, we should consider the possible implications upon the draft, but that's another story. Basically, it's time for Bryce to sh¡t or get off the pot. https://roundtable.io/sports/nfl/panthers/news/carolina-panthers-dave-canales-holds-nothing-back-on-bryce-young-in-new-interview
×
×
  • Create New...