Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's watching Sunday's 9/25 game?


Tomcatn
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

If the Panthers fanbase were fair-weather, it would've ceased to exist years ago and www.carolinahuddle.com/ would lead you to "This URL Is Available On GoDaddy!" 

You may have missed the point.  A panther board is not where you go to promote fair weather fandom.  That was the point I was attempting to project.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, ThPantherFan said:

Actually, not a bad point.  With the way the coaching is going I would like the team to win enough to keep the players hopes up but lose enough to get the ^%^%^#^%*(*&^rule fired.  And Snow also.

I’m not letting myself believe another couple losses get Rhule fired, I’m prepared for an extended stay.

However, if we lose the next 2-3 games (if Tepper even registers as a human person) that should trigger a pressure release that sends tubby back to school.  (*Not a prediction just what should happen.)

Anywho, week 3 and I’m already in “just make it hurt” territory.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

So let me get this straight.  You go to a Panthers Board to create a thread that informs Panther fans that you will not be watching the game Sunday.

Is there something I am missing here?

Season 17 Episode 22 GIF by The Simpsons

I think you can decide not to watch a game and not be considered a fair weather fan. 
I watch every Sunday because I am hopelessly addicted to football. But, honestly, I have had the thought to not watch the Panthers until Rhule is fired. 
I’ll never do it though, but I did have the thought. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do believe the Panthers will be in line for a win one time this season, like 99% chance of winning with less than 30 seconds left, and Rhule will do something so insanely stupid that it costs the team its only win.

Something like icing his punter and it gets blocked and returned for a TD, or thinking it's third down when it's fourth and Baker takes a knee at his own 5 and the other team kicks a FG, something like that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the guys who are active on Sundays at 1 p.m., not a single one believes they're going to win. They know going in that someone's gonna do something stupid, or the refs are gonna spot the ball 8 yards short, or Rhule will challenge a Panthers touchdown, and they will lose.

For nothing in this world is as certain as when the Carolina Panthers play an NFL regular season game, their opponent will win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...