Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing here?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

McAdoo is not good at his job. I can’t believe we were excited about this hire. He is a consultant/assistant coach at very best. He might actually be worse than Brady. 

If we could have paired McAdoo's NFL experience with Brady's brain, we might have ourselves a decent OC.  I think Joe will eventually be very successful in the NFL, we just threw him to the wolves way too soon.  And even then, he was light years better than what we have had since he was let go. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like some wing-T flexbone bull crap with the TEs being wing backs. 

That aside, has anyone noticed our splits on the OL? Rule of thumb is 3ft splits, or at least what I always was told to spread out gaps and assist with running lanes. 

We have mismatched splits across the whole OL there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joemac said:

If we could have paired McAdoo's NFL experience with Brady's brain, we might have ourselves a decent OC.  I think Joe will eventually be very successful in the NFL, we just threw him to the wolves way too soon.  And even then, he was light years better than what we have had since he was let go. 

I think both of them suck. Picking the right QB to run your offense doesn't hurt either. I swear teddy two gloves is still the best QB of the Rhule era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

I think both of them suck. Picking the right QB to run your offense doesn't hurt either. I swear teddy two gloves is still the best QB of the Rhule era. 

He definitely was.  We had something resembling a real NFL offense when he was the QB.  Not much of that since. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

He definitely was.  We had something resembling a real NFL offense when he was the QB.  Not much of that since. 

I'm not sure what's been worse. The coaching or personal selection over the years. I mean the draft is providing Rhule has no clue there. Especially because there seems to be no plan and the coaches kind of just pick who they like. Or the consistent losing of close games and leads that a head coach should be managing. It's a total FUBAR situation. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...