Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing here?

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

McAdoo is not good at his job. I can’t believe we were excited about this hire. He is a consultant/assistant coach at very best. He might actually be worse than Brady. 

If we could have paired McAdoo's NFL experience with Brady's brain, we might have ourselves a decent OC.  I think Joe will eventually be very successful in the NFL, we just threw him to the wolves way too soon.  And even then, he was light years better than what we have had since he was let go. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted

It looks like some wing-T flexbone bull crap with the TEs being wing backs. 

That aside, has anyone noticed our splits on the OL? Rule of thumb is 3ft splits, or at least what I always was told to spread out gaps and assist with running lanes. 

We have mismatched splits across the whole OL there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, joemac said:

If we could have paired McAdoo's NFL experience with Brady's brain, we might have ourselves a decent OC.  I think Joe will eventually be very successful in the NFL, we just threw him to the wolves way too soon.  And even then, he was light years better than what we have had since he was let go. 

I think both of them suck. Picking the right QB to run your offense doesn't hurt either. I swear teddy two gloves is still the best QB of the Rhule era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Snake said:

I think both of them suck. Picking the right QB to run your offense doesn't hurt either. I swear teddy two gloves is still the best QB of the Rhule era. 

He definitely was.  We had something resembling a real NFL offense when he was the QB.  Not much of that since. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
Just now, joemac said:

He definitely was.  We had something resembling a real NFL offense when he was the QB.  Not much of that since. 

I'm not sure what's been worse. The coaching or personal selection over the years. I mean the draft is providing Rhule has no clue there. Especially because there seems to be no plan and the coaches kind of just pick who they like. Or the consistent losing of close games and leads that a head coach should be managing. It's a total FUBAR situation. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...