Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official 49ers at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Do you realize the #1 city for transplants to Charlotte is surprise.......San Francisco......due to the banking industry. 

After that then it is update NY in the Syracuse area followed by Pittsburgh and Eastern Ohio..........all are rust belt areas of course.......with a younger demographic moving to this part of the country.

It is difficult to establish an expansion team fan base to begin with...............especially one in which the town is known for transplants like Charlotte............

Sure they got lots of bandwagon fans as a novelty during their 2nd year playoff run......and when they had their two SB runs...........but you see what's left in the core fan base during losing seasons like now.

Charlotte....is often referred to as the town people move to for finding jobs but go somewhere else on the weekends for fun. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised a single game thread for a poorly run organization, crappy product and substandard performance actually garnered 107 pages of posts.

My question is this: if you're willing to invest your valuable time and effort into a historically poor performer, why not find one of the worst performing stocks on the NYSE and put your hard-earned savings there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, am I reading this wrong?  Here is a quote from Rhule's post-game press conference:

RE: The guys came out early in the 3rd quarter with the Christian [McCaffrey] touchdown. What and who was behind the decision to go for two that early in the quarter?

Yeah, you know, down 14 with the ball on the one. Had the ball had not been on the one, we wouldn’t have done it. I think we have talked a couple times, down 14 now, there is kind of the whole analytics movement to go for two and make it a one-score game. The time was pretty close to the vest. We held them to really 10 points on defense. So, had it been on the two, we wouldn’t have done it but with the ball on the one, feeling like with Christian [McCaffrey] we could hopefully punch it in from a yard out.

Uh, the score was 17-9 when they faced that decision.  It was already a one-score game, and kicking the point (which would have been snapped from either the 7.5 or 10 because of the penalty) would have made it a 7-point deficit.  Going for two would not "make it a one-score game."

I get the ball on the 1-yard line logic, but when was the last time we were any good at short-yardage situations?  Somewhere in his vast knowledge of "analytics" our poor track record at those situations has to enter in.  We just came out and made the score competitive to start the half, given the situation, why give their defense a chance to diffuse any momentum from the TD drive?

But even given that difference in philosophy, the basis of his argument seems to be "down 14," and making it a one-score game by going for two.  The math doesn't make it any better down by 14, but okay. 

Am I being overly critical, or does his statement sound like he was unaware of the situation?  Or is this just the latest case of a BS artist BS-ing to insert "analytics" into the conversation to try and sound like the smartest guy in the room or appeal to an owner who claims to embrace analytics?"

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

OK, am I reading this wrong?  Here is a quote from Rhule's post-game press conference:

RE: The guys came out early in the 3rd quarter with the Christian [McCaffrey] touchdown. What and who was behind the decision to go for two that early in the quarter?

Yeah, you know, down 14 with the ball on the one. Had the ball had not been on the one, we wouldn’t have done it. I think we have talked a couple times, down 14 now, there is kind of the whole analytics movement to go for two and make it a one-score game. The time was pretty close to the vest. We held them to really 10 points on defense. So, had it been on the two, we wouldn’t have done it but with the ball on the one, feeling like with Christian [McCaffrey] we could hopefully punch it in from a yard out.

Uh, the score was 17-9 when they faced that decision.  It was already a one-score game, and kicking the point (which would have been snapped from either the 7.5 or 10 because of the penalty) would have made it a 7-point deficit.  Going for two would not "make it a one-score game."

I get the ball on the 1-yard line logic, but when was the last time we were any good at short-yardage situations?  Somewhere in his vast knowledge of "analytics" our poor track record at those situations has to enter in.  We just came out and made the score competitive to start the half, given the situation, why give their defense a chance to diffuse any momentum from the TD drive?

But even given that difference in philosophy, the basis of his argument seems to be "down 14," and making it a one-score game by going for two.  The math doesn't make it any better down by 14, but okay. 

Am I being overly critical, or does his statement sound like he was unaware of the situation?  Or is this just the latest case of a BS artist BS-ing to insert "analytics" into the conversation to try and sound like the smartest guy in the room or appeal to an owner who claims to embrace analytics?"

Wouldn't be a big shock if that was the moment Tepper decided he was going to fire Rhule this morning. Simply don't see the rationale of even attempting a 2 point conversion in that scenario, especially with an inept offense that struggles to get into the end zone. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2022 at 6:29 PM, stbugs said:

That’s what I was told.

@Basbear Any thoughts? Seems to me into year 2, he’s a liability and we would have been better off drafting a CB.

Hes had about one bad result per game, some of which he was in great position and the others just plain beat/poor tech/etc. Hes as good as any 4th rounder(Im taking in the 5th and 3rd= 4th). Again given that JC Horn(main reason the trade happened, that you and 11 forget) is on the other side, CJ will get attention 10/10. Hes not played at his 9th overall pick status, but not dog meat either. Hes only getting 3mill per year, theres PLENTY of CBs out getting 8 digits and playing poorer/sim..... 

I will he is slightly playing below my expectations 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...