Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PHIL SNOW FIRED AS WELL


TheWiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Just wanted to reiterate...  The more that has happened, the more it looks like those rumors were completely spot on.  Wilks was fuming behind the scenes, and I didn't really buy it before, but it is starting to look more and more believable that Snow was the actual guy calling the shots in the Rhule regime - which is fuging insane.  This is just amazing how this had all unfolded.  Wilks gives me hope that we can put something in place that resembles a functioning, professional football team again.

So, I guess you can say Rhule Snowed us.....   hahaha

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

We didn't tank for Cam we sucked and remember it took unti.year 3 before we had a winning record. And we didn't have a QB already we thought could be a starter. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't draft another QB high with Fitterer swing for the fences but my point is we don't need to purposely suck to find one.

You’re right we tanked for Luck and Luck stayed in school so we got Cam. Then the Colts tanked for Luck and got Luck. Worked out about as well as you can ask it to for both teams. Keep up with your revisionist history though. 
 

We want the option to evaluate all the QBs and pick the one we think will be best, not be left with the one we like second or third best and then hope our talent evaluation sucks or we get lucky. Just because the best QB in the class is not always the first picked is not a good reason to not want the option to pick first.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

The defense wasn't elite, but it was far from the problem, this is an odd move.

But one I approve as I thought firing Rhule made the team better and I want to get the #1 pick at this point, this thankfully makes the team a bit worse again lol

snow was a rhule guy. there would be nothing but discontent. made sense from that stand point...esp. if friction between wilkes and snow was truly there. no way it would have worked snow working for wilkes.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Don't worry about them.

Staring I See You GIF by QuikTrip

 

They'll be flipping out when we pick Will Anderson or Miles Murphy.

The QB we have in hand is better than a Young and Stroud in the bush. Rhule screwed up evaluation of Corral so yes, you are wise, that MUST take place because they traded up for the guy and he was actually QB1 according to McAdoo, who although isn't the best OC his eye for QB talent is legit.

 

the lone corral apologist lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

You’re right we tanked for Luck and Luck stayed in school so we got Cam. Then the Colts tanked for Luck and got Luck. Worked out about as well as you can ask it to for both teams. Keep up with your revisionist history though. 
 

We want the option to evaluate all the QBs and pick the one we think will be best, not be left with the one we like second or third best and then hope our talent evaluation sucks or we get lucky. Just because the best QB in the class is not always the first picked is not a good reason to not want the option to pick first.

Again there is a huge difference between sucking and tanking. And even with Manning and Luck being supposedly the best the Colts win 1 superbowl between them.  Meanwhile the Patriots won a bunch of SBs with a 6 rounder again proving you don't need to tank to find your franchise guy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ^I want that, but Rodriguez over KC. Don't hate KC as much at that spot, but rather take a WR with the pick we gain in that trade than in the 1st. 
    • I think there is good points in this thread to what the team needs to do. 1) Ball isn't really the issue but, he needs reigned in.  Coach and he need to realize when things aren't falling from the three and learn to play other facets of the game.  He's an amazing talent and when he's on, he's on.  But he can also shoot you out of a game.  We're lucky Miami went that way but that is too many missed threes.  He still needs to bulk up if he can, but he needs to drive more.  He's pretty good at finishing usually and hopefully the fouls come (probably not though).   2) The whole team needs to be more physical.  As others have stated, we need more bulk in our bigs.  Diabate is a hurricane of energy but cannot go against the larger centers.  I love him on the team but he should be more of a match up type guy or energy off the bench.  I think he'd be insane off the bench.  However I think the biggest issue with Diabate and Kaulk is the lack of offensive game.  The lack of a jump shot or anything.  Teams figured out to just leave them on the screen and crash lanes.  There has to be some sort of threat.  We need a 4 and a 5 that can do those things and stretch out the court. 3) Bridges.  He's just undersized.  However, I feel he really threw his all into it the last few weeks when others were gassed.  He was ok not being a focal point.  I'd like to have him off the bench as well but I assume he'd be traded to make things work.  4) Miller.  Dude can light it up when on, but disappears for quarters at a time.  Also he needs to work on ball handling and passing.  He's a turnover machine at bad times.  Also hopefully over the injury so he can bulk up too.   5) Kon. Just a rookie.  Long season and back injury.  I have no doubt he'll be back stronger and focused.  Needs to work on defense and physicality like the whole team but yes, a rookie he'll get there. 6) Coby.  Has to be resigned, no question.  The bench lineup is rough without him running the point.  Team has big potential and the front office seems sharp.  They seen the hive and how crazy it got and how much the city wants this.  
×
×
  • Create New...