Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills reach out about CMC


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Jmac said:

It has been reported by Dan Fetes(?), that the Bills have inquired about CMC. Possibly looking for some sort of trade.

Would you do the deal if if involved draft picks for 2023?  

We had a 10 page thread about it already haha

Edited by NAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get rid of our biggest problem and now it's time to sell of everything of worth???

Are you guys fuging crazy?

This team is a coach and a QB away from being really competitive. We are poised to get both of those. Why do you want to set us back five years by having a fuging fire sale now?

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If we get their 1st (which I doubt) and finish last (which could happen), we would have pick 1, 28-31ish, and 32.  What a great way to start over with a new coach!

That’s a very good perspective 3 players in the top 33 ish should be 3 foundational players. That’s basically 3 first rounders because talents slips through not a bad way to start a rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

If we retain salary they would.

CMC probably puts them over the top.

Over the top?!?!?!  FFS!  How much more "over the top" do they need to be?

They have the #2 scoring offense and the #1 scoring defense.

The Bills don't need CMC, let alone would they give up anything for him.  That team is built RIGHT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Over the top?!?!?!  FFS!  How much more "over the top" do they need to be?

They have the #2 scoring offense and the #1 scoring defense.

The Bills don't need CMC, let alone would they give up anything for him.  That team is built RIGHT.

Nothing is guaranteed in this league.  CMC just makes the Bills even more dangerous.

I am not supporting trading CMC at all, just saying that if the Panthers retained salary on CMC's deal they probably could get two firsts (the Bills knowing they would be low 1st rounders) and AT LEAST a 1st and 2nd in different years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

Nothing is guaranteed in this league.  CMC just makes the Bills even more dangerous.

I am not supporting trading CMC at all, just saying that if the Panthers retained salary on CMC's deal they probably could get two firsts (the Bills knowing they would be low 1st rounders) and AT LEAST a 1st and 2nd in different years.

Patriots will get eaten alive playing against the Bills if they had CMC. We can sit back and watch the great Mac Jones get thrashed and refs being blamed for their demise by Patriots fans.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

That’s a very good perspective 3 players in the top 33 ish should be 3 foundational players. That’s basically 3 first rounders because talents slips through not a bad way to start a rebuild.

With Miami forfeiting their pick it pretty much is 3 first round picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Over the top?!?!?!  FFS!  How much more "over the top" do they need to be?

They have the #2 scoring offense and the #1 scoring defense.

The Bills don't need CMC, let alone would they give up anything for him.  That team is built RIGHT.

There is no team that is over the top that can't use more weapons to make them more unstoppable. No team is built right until they have a juggernaut team and the Bills would be just that if they did acquire CMC.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...