Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera really stepped into it


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Calculated Risk-Taker Ronald clarified that he was talking about the QB's familiarity within the offense, i.e. Wentz has been with Washington for 1 year whereas the other QBs have had much longer to learn and operate within their respective offenses.

https://www.nfl.com/news/commanders-hc-ron-rivera-takes-mea-culpa-for-carson-wentz-comments

Not only is MoRon a moron, he’s also a beta-moron.

Just ask his alpha-wife.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This video was cut to take what he said completely out of context. What he said was dumb and he didn't think it through, but he elaborated that the difference is that all the QBs having success on other NFC East teams have been with those teams and in those systems longer, while Wentz has only been with the Skins less than a year. Still dumb but VERY different from what this doctored video suggests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, matt rhules gut fat said:

My man doesn’t have Cam to drag him to those COTY awards anymore.

Also, why is a defensive genius’s defense near the bottom of the league on a frequent basis?

Such a great coach

 

Because he doesn't have McDermott calling plays or Luke to fix his mistakes pre-snap silly. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, vorbis said:

first of all, he's right. maybe this reverberates through the locker room and screws up the team dynamic but he's 100% correct.

You think Daniel Jones and Cooper Rush are significant upgrades over Wentz?  LOL  

RGIII is right, the difference is coaching in that division.  Only team with a superior QB are the Eagles.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...