Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Line...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

They made major strides. I'm still wondering if we're at our best situation at Center, but it does seem to be working. 

There's nothing like watching the Bears and Commanders just kill each others' QBs last night to make you thankful for what we've now got. 

I'm really curious to see how Walker and Darnold can play behind this line. Sadly, I think Mayfield is broken and it's not the blocking (by our o-line at least) that seems to be the source of his problems.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically an adequate line leads to offensive production. Is McAdoo THAT inept or do we place the blame elsewhere? CMC sure as hell isn’t a problem. Surely we’ve seen Moore and Anderson and even our TE group be more productive than what we’ve seen with a worse line. Wtf is going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Typically an adequate line leads to offensive production. Is McAdoo THAT inept or do we place the blame elsewhere? CMC sure as hell isn’t a problem. Surely we’ve seen Moore and Anderson and even our TE group be more productive than what we’ve seen with a worse line. Wtf is going on?

That will be one of the more intriguing things to watch for on Sunday. Wilks wasted no time giving McAdoo his thoughts on the offensive play calling, so we'll see. I think McAdoo is too stubborn/stuck in his ways to adjust but I hope I'm wrong. They literally just need to run more and up the play action calls from 10% to 20-30%

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Typically an adequate line leads to offensive production. Is McAdoo THAT inept or do we place the blame elsewhere? CMC sure as hell isn’t a problem. Surely we’ve seen Moore and Anderson and even our TE group be more productive than what we’ve seen with a worse line. Wtf is going on?

The offensive scheme/playbook/playcalling is a big problem and the issues compound with poor QB play.  

 

Edited by saX man
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...