Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D played better with no phil snow


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Seemed the same

 

28 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Seemed the same

 

48 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Not really. Injuries are a part of the game. We've played without Horn and Luvu before, as well as others. The defense would probably look a lot better if the offense wasn't dog poo.

Yeah, I didn't notice much difference especially considering how much the Ram's O has struggled this season.  The Rams, scored more points in the Atlanta game, but besides that, this was the Ram's  best offensive performance.  We had injuries last week too, Chinn, Luvu, Woods and STO were out last week with Horn getting hurt mid game.   Kupp was hurt and the OL decimated.  Its not a great look.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They played literally identical.  Same play calls for the most part.   This is just subconscious rose colored glasses for someone happy Snow is gone.  The defense has been solid all year.  They are just built badly for how we play.   Our defense is built on speed and aggressiveness playing with a lead.  When you are playing conservative grind it out ball or playing from behind with the defense on the field all second half this is about the best you can always expect.   It was a terrible gameplan.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm looking at the schedule and I see a 10+win season easy.  I think Carolina goes undefeated in the division.  I also believe that the Bears, Bengals, Lions, Browns, Steelers are very winnable.  Revenge game with phillips and the eagles could be a win.  Honestly only 2 games I see as chalking up a L to off the bat is the Seahawks and Broncos.
    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
×
×
  • Create New...