Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Pats relationship with Mac Jones "gone sideways"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

From Albert Breer...

Now, the thought of trading for Jones is probably gonna cross someone's mind after hearing this, even if only for a moment.

I don't know that it should.

Why? Because what the Pats would ask is likely more than I'd actually believe he's worth.

Either way, when things are going "sideways" up in Patriot Land, it's always good for a chuckle 😄

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, trueblade said:

Trading for Jones doesn't seem like a prudent thing to do. I felt the Patriots running game and defense carried Jones more than Jones carried the team. They are getting pretty much the exact same results with Zappe Hour.

IMO, Zappe looks better than Jones.  It's only been a couple of starts but I like the way he has been playing.  I think NE nabbed another good QB in the latter rounds. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  As I stated earlier…. there are indications that Jones was a mistake. 

Jones wasn't a mistake as long as they had McDaniels. He was a great fit for that system.

With McDaniels gone, it changes a lot of things.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • https://wfnz.com/schedule/the-clubhouse-with-kyle-bailey/ Starts around 1100 I am not sure how connected Al Wallace is but he thinks bryce is going to get paid (50+) and it may happen within the first 4 games of this season.   He thinks the offense looked good last season.  Not really sure what the hell he was watching.
    • Waiting to see how the OT situation plays out is probably going to be a big part of the calculus.
    • If you draft players who can push the starters in competitions, then you have depth.  Gantt's focus is Week 1, 2026.  That is never my view.  if your focus is on talent alone, and if you do not consider the salary cap, then this is accurate.  If a player making $25m per season can be traded or not renewed because you have a player on a rookie contract who can do the job almost as well--before the maturation and experience occurs, then you may take a small step back for a moment so that you can leap forward later.  About Walker--LTs have done pretty well in Green Bay's system.  He is a good pass protector, and so is Freeling. About DT--they are often rotational.  Hunter will still play and he will improve with experience.  The WR field is not that crowded.  If you have 5 different WRs who can play, they usually do.  Hecht might have the best opportunity to take a starting job, and he is a fifth rounder.   So you look at the cap and the idea is to start as many on rookie contracts as possible.  Does that mean to start rookies day 1.  Nope.  
×
×
  • Create New...