Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Don't know how Fitterer felt.

Person stated that Rhule directed all the quarterback moves with Fitterer "signing off" on them.

He didn't have the power to say no, even if he wanted to.

Didn't Rhule say something to the opposite of that? Like he had his hands full coaching and didn't want GM duties. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

But how do you create a place players want to be with a move like this. These are their futures we're talking about. Mailing it in for 10 games can have a huge impact on them and their next contract or if they even get a look from another team in FA. This is sending the wrong fugging message. Burns, Brown, Chinn, DJ. I would expect them all to want out. These guys play to win. Tepper has only accomplished one thing in Carolina. Losing. 

At least Richardson and Hurney achieved mediocrity for us, with a sprinkle of excellence once in a blue moon. Now we are the definition of hilariously epic failure...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

49ers dominated a much better Packers team in the playoffs last year (and that Packers are coming off a blowout loss at home to the Jets). LOL at the Giants - their luck won't continue. Vikings are Fools Gold and you really trust Kirk Cousins in the playoffs. I'll give you the Cowboys and Eagles but they are in the same division so one will be seeded lower than 4.

The 49ers would be favored against all of those teams at a neutral site except maybe the Eagles

The 49ers lost to the bears broncos and the falcons…. You can’t knock those other teams and not the niners. 
 

their dline is all 2nd and 3rd stringers, their down two defensive backs, 3rd string right tackle, 2nd string left tackle.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

The 49ers lost to the bears broncos and the falcons…. You can’t knock those other teams and not the niners. 
 

their dline is all 2nd and 3rd stringers, their down two defensive backs, 3rd string right tackle, 2nd string left tackle.

This is what we need to hear. 49er demise. I don’t wanna be THAT guy, but this franchise needs it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

But we are the worst team in the league. Ickey looks the part and Horn is good when healthy but who else is contributing?

Brown, Burns, Icky, Horn, BC, Jordon, Henderson, off the top of my head. Jury is still out on YGM. Shenault showed a lot of promise recently. we have plenty of young talent brought in in the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...