Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Zod said:

2nd 3rd 4th 5th is fair for a guy that has barely played in two years.

Yeah, it sucks, but in todays NFL you dont need a superstar RB and you also shouldnt be giving them big contracts. The best you should do at the RB position is to rotate 2 guys and not breaking the bank for either. This one hurts, but Im glad we got some compensation for him while he still has value.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

What does the trade value chart say? Do those picks equal the value of a late 1st rounder?

Also, any word on his contract? How much are we still paying?

Depends where those picks end up.  Top of each round? Yes.  Bottom of each? No. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems fine. Would rather of had a late 1st but those are picks we can really use.

Ok so now we let go one big guy so does anyone else get loud after all of this? I have no idea but I wouldn't be shocked if someone else asked out now that we have sent 2 guys away since firing the HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

I think a lot of people just had unrealistic expectations of his trade value. This isn’t Madden.

Given recent injury history we made out fantastic . Not sure what some are smoking around here 

Edited by Frank9999
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...