Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welp… Stroud is the guy, right?


Recommended Posts

Are we really sure none of the other bottom feeder teams will be able to out suck us for the top pick? I mean I realize firing your head coach and trading away your only offensive weapon are strong opening moves in that direction, but I wouldn't count the Lions out just yet. They have tons of experience at being awful. Who are the teams we might screw up and beat with a few key plays breaking our way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Stroud is my preference for now. Definitely looks different from the OSU QBs before. Reads the defense well, goes through progressions, throws an absolutely beautiful ball, evasive in the pocket but not a runner.  Looks like the one.

Young looks like a playmaker but not only is his size a concern but his game also has the biggest potential to not translate of the two in my opinion. I haven’t seen any others that even warrant conversation. Definitely not Levis from what I’ve seen so far. 

Levis is a guy that has been on a flat plane so far this season.  He's doing nothing to really deter scouts but nothing to rocket up as QB1.  He's got mad potential, mechanics are there, arm, athleticism, attitude, grit, etc....but you watch his games and I'm like waiting for him to really show "it".  And it just seems so flat.

Then you take a step back, assess, see his overall makeup and get hyped.  It's kind of a Daniel Jones feel for me and I just don't know. Makes me more nervous than Young honestly but I'm fluctuating back and forth.

Stroud really shows a lot and doesn't have the physical question marks.  The only thing is the Ryan Day system if fluid year to year and is tailored to the QB.  So it's a different offense than what Fields had.  Thing is Stroud's ball placement is elite.  Not college elite, but just NFL elite.  His arm is probably a tier below the grand slam dudes like Allen and Pat, but he's just got the most well rounded game in the class.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Are we really sure none of the other bottom feeder teams will be able to out suck us for the top pick? I mean I realize firing your head coach and trading away your only offensive weapon are strong opening moves in that direction, but I wouldn't count the Lions out just yet. They have tons of experience at being awful. Who are the teams we might screw up and beat with a few key plays breaking our way?

thats why baker and darnold need to stay on the bench for 11 more games.

 

Nuke it from orbit, its the only way to be sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, davos said:

Levis is a guy that has been on a flat plane so far this season.  He's doing nothing to really deter scouts but nothing to rocket up as QB1.  He's got mad potential, mechanics are there, arm, athleticism, attitude, grit, etc....but you watch his games and I'm like waiting for him to really show "it".  And it just seems so flat.

Then you take a step back, assess, see his overall makeup and get hyped.  It's kind of a Daniel Jones feel for me and I just don't know. Makes me more nervous than Young honestly but I'm fluctuating back and forth.

Stroud really shows a lot and doesn't have the physical question marks.  The only thing is the Ryan Day system if fluid year to year and is tailored to the QB.  So it's a different offense than what Fields had.  Thing is Stroud's ball placement is elite.  Not college elite, but just NFL elite.  His arm is probably a tier below the grand slam dudes like Allen and Pat, but he's just got the most well rounded game in the class.  

Go back and watch Levis from 2021. We had a much better OC at Kentucky. Liam Coen. He’s with the Rams now, but he really flashed Will’s potential last season with his play calling. Kentuckys offense has really taken a step back year and it can mainly be attributed to play calling. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

Levis is a guy that has been on a flat plane so far this season.  He's doing nothing to really deter scouts but nothing to rocket up as QB1.  He's got mad potential, mechanics are there, arm, athleticism, attitude, grit, etc....but you watch his games and I'm like waiting for him to really show "it".  And it just seems so flat.

Then you take a step back, assess, see his overall makeup and get hyped.  It's kind of a Daniel Jones feel for me and I just don't know. Makes me more nervous than Young honestly but I'm fluctuating back and forth.

Stroud really shows a lot and doesn't have the physical question marks.  The only thing is the Ryan Day system if fluid year to year and is tailored to the QB.  So it's a different offense than what Fields had.  Thing is Stroud's ball placement is elite.  Not college elite, but just NFL elite.  His arm is probably a tier below the grand slam dudes like Allen and Pat, but he's just got the most well rounded game in the class.  

I agree with everything you said. Levis doesn’t look bad, just nothing I saw really impressed me. I’m much more interested in what I see during game time than measurables.
 

Young reminds me of Watson, good and bad (on the field).  From what I’ve seen of Hooker he is the epitome of one read and run QB. No thanks.  I watched a couple games worth of videos and never saw a single second read. Helluva athlete though. 
 

Stroud just looks like the total package, but he also had a superior system and weapons so I try to filter that out and focus on his decision making, throws (placement, touch, anticipation), and things that are independent from those. With most guys you’ll either have the “he’s got superior weapons” argument or “he hasn’t played anybody/cupcake division” argument because of a team is going against top tier teams then they’re going to be a top tier team too, weapons, system and all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I agree with everything you said. Levis doesn’t look bad, just nothing I saw really impressed me. I’m much more interested in what I see during game time than measurables.
 

Young reminds me of Watson, good and bad (on the field).  From what I’ve seen of Hooker he is the epitome of one read and run QB. No thanks.  I watched a couple games worth of videos and never saw a single second read. Helluva athlete though. 
 

Stroud just looks like the total package, but he also had a superior system and weapons so I try to filter that out and focus on his decision making, throws (placement, touch, anticipation), and things that are independent from those. With most guys you’ll either have the “he’s got superior weapons” argument or “he hasn’t played anybody/cupcake division” argument because of a team is going against top tier teams then they’re going to be a top tier team too, weapons, system and all. 

You must not be evaluating with the same glasses.  Stroud is a product of a good OSU system.  He has all the tools but I don't see him using them all the time.  I watched some of his videos and one thing that stood out to me was some of his passes just kind of float out to his WIDE OPEN receivers.  I've seen him zip passes but I've also seen them float.  If he does that in the NFL he'll get a lot of picks.

I haven't watched Levis yet so I'll give my POV later.

I wouldn't be upset with Young, Stroud or Hooker.  All have strong skill sets and all have question marks.  IMO none of them are surefire franchise QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You must not be evaluating with the same glasses.  Stroud is a product of a good OSU system.  He has all the tools but I don't see him using them all the time.  I watched some of his videos and one thing that stood out to me was some of his passes just kind of float out to his WIDE OPEN receivers.  I've seen him zip passes but I've also seen them float.  If he does that in the NFL he'll get a lot of picks.

I haven't watched Levis yet so I'll give my POV later.

I wouldn't be upset with Young, Stroud or Hooker.  All have strong skill sets and all have question marks.  IMO none of them are surefire franchise QBs.

I’ve watched a bunch of Stroud videos including all three of JT OSullivan’s QB School videos and the only passes I saw float were the ones that were intended to float to drop in over a defenders head. He doesn’t just throw to wide open receivers, he makes throws in tight windows, with great touch over defenders’ heads, zips passes in on crossing routes and comebacks with great anticipation. He makes all the throws and looks the furtherest thing from a system QB that OSU or most any school has produced.   
 

I’ve also watched pretty much every video for Young, Levis and Hooker. They have legit concerns, more real than just “his school hasn’t produced good QBs in the past”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You nailed it with Pelaton instructor lol
    • I think some in here are over estimating how far that 27m is going to go.   Just Jarvis, Guentzel and Chatfield are going to cost around 17 AAV.    Jarvy even with a bridge deal is going to make in the 5m AAV range.  Guentzel is going to be in the 9m AAV range.  Chatfield will be in the 3-4m AAV range.  Skjei wants around 7m AAV, Pesce already turned down a 5m AAV deal last offseason.  This team is going to see a lot of changes going into next year. I do mean a lot of them. 
    • FITSPRESSO REVIEWS (Critical CUSTOMER Update!!) Must Read Last updated 12 seconds ago, Sunday 19 May 2024 FitSpresso Reviews: Overall, the reviews of FitSpresso are mostly positive (Rating 4.92/5). It seems to be a safe and effective way to help you lose weight without having to make any major lifestyle changes. If you're looking for an easy and convenient way to lose weight, then this product may be worth considering. This FitSpresso reviews will explore whether this weight loss powder can deliver on its claims to increase energy, burn fat, and improve wellbeing using natural ingredients. Fitspresso contains metabolism-activating compounds like green tea, probiotics, and Guarana seed to ignite fat burning while curbing hunger. Click here to Buy FitSpresso and Get Up to 75% DISCOUNT NOW   Click here to Learn More about Fitspresso Coffee   Users say mixing one scoop of FitSpresso into water or a smoothie gives them sustained energy and focus to power through healthy habits and workouts. Keep reading this FitSpresso review to learn more about how its research-backed formula provides an advantage for achieving your weight loss goals. With FitSpresso, get ready to rediscover your zest for life! Losing weight is about more than dropping pounds – it’s about achieving better health. A supplement like FitSpresso that addresses overall wellbeing may offer an adjunct to diet and exercise for those struggling to slim down. Read on for the full FitSpresso Review and decide if it could be right for you. FitSpresso Coffee: A Novel Weight Loss Supplement! The report published by the US National Institutes of Health should raise everyone’s eyebrows as it states one in three adults is overweight. The modern age has offered lots of advantages and people in general lead a life of comfort. It has manifested itself in ways like obesity that most of us tend to ignore. Click here to Buy FitSpresso and Get Up to 75% DISCOUNT NOW   Click here to Learn More about Fitspresso Coffee     What Is FitSpresso? FitSpresso is a weight management formula that promotes healthy weight loss along with multiple health benefits. It is an organic blend of potent natural substances branded as effective in dealing with most of the health ailments we face in our daily lives. The FitSpresso weight loss supplement is made in an FDA-approved facility that is certified by the GMP. It does not have any trace of GMOs or chemical stimulants added in its formulation. It is a natural weight loss aid that can be taken by all adults without age restrictions.   How Does FitSpresso Work? FitSpresso is an herbal weight loss formula that makes use of exogenous ketones that promote weight loss in a fast and effective manner. The supplement’s potent ingredients do not allow fat deposition in the body and help to burn stored fats in a sustainable manner. Besides, it also contains ingredients that help to manage stress and thereby speed up the process of weight loss. It works round the clock and supports metabolic processes in the body throughout. Another advantage that FitSpresso fat burner has is its ability to maintain healthy blood sugar levels. The FitSpresso supplement suppresses sugar cravings and helps you stay mentally focused on your daily activities. It helps consistent fat-burning through thermogenesis, a process in which the body raises its temperature.   FitSpresso Real Customer Reviews FitSpresso has the reputation of receiving maximum numbers of positive feedback in short time frames. The FitSpresso users have opened up their minds and minced no words in complementing the supplement for its effective results. However, not all FitSpresso customer reviews received were positive. We could also see some criticism against it for the delayed action in producing results.   Scientific Evidence Behind Key Ingredients The FitSpresso weight loss supplement is backed by solid scientific evidence. Plenty of studies are available on the ingredients used in the formula and the working principle that it follows. The supplement consists of a proprietary blend of 6 ingredients. All the FitSpresso ingredients used in the supplement are listed below along with scientific studies on the benefits that they offer:   FitSpresso Side Effects FitSpresso, unlike many other supplements, has no chemicals added to its formulation. It is due to this fact that the supplement does not induce any health problems in the long run. There haven’t been any single instances of side effects for it anywhere to date. Please follow the label instructions strictly to avoid overuse of the supplement.   FitSpresso Reviews: Conclusion FitSpresso is a novel weight loss supplement that is formulated using core natural materials specifically designed to manage your body weight. It is made using organic and herbal compounds which have a record of aiding us in health matters. In this FitSpresso review, the supplement is made in high-quality production centers registered under the FDA and certified by GMP which are located in the US. It is made available in the form of healthy capsules which are ideal for oral consumption. FitSpresso has garnered a lot of positive feedback in short periods. In the FitSpresso reviews for weight loss, the user community has made their approval for the supplement public in their positive reviews. The supplement is affordable at lower rates along with added discounts.         Click here to Buy FitSpresso and Get Up to 75% DISCOUNT NOW     Click here to Learn More about Fitspresso Coffee   Click here to Buy FitSpresso and Get Up to 75% DISCOUNT NOW Click here to Learn More about Fitspresso Coffee FitSpresso customer reviews FitSpresso Coffee Reviews FitSpresso FitSpresso Review FitSpresso Real Reviews FitSpresso Reviews Australia FitSpresso Reviews FitSpresso Coffee FitSpresso Coffee Loophole Reviews is Fitspresso Safe?   JHSYUE@^%&*^BJKIO&(*                                                                                                                                                                                                        
×
×
  • Create New...