Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: if Wilks does a good job...


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

All depends on how he performs. If he can lead this team, with PJ at QB and actually improve the team making good roster decisions, then he deserves to be part of the coaching search. That's about all I'm willing to say because I want this process to be thorough and as many qualified candidates as we can interviewed. If he's the best out of all those we interview, great. If not, so be it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mc52beast said:

It’s amazing that we win one game and suddenly we’re playoff contenders. Y’all are probably the ones who went nuts after Sam went 3-0 and Kyle Allen was ballin.

I mean we are playoff contenders right now.  The NFC South is terrible.

We have the best defense in the division IMO 

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to judge the man like you should judge any head coach. It's the wins in the end. Progress is good, but it is deceiving as each year your squad can change immensely in truth but little on paper. Please see the Buccaneers, Rams and Bengals for examples.

He now has a win. I'm not putting that first week against him and no one should.

If he somehow pulls a winning season out of this, it will be a miracle and one we cannot, in any way shape or form ignore. If he breaks five wins, then he at least needs to be in consideration.

Right now he has A win. I hope he gets many more. He has elevated the players on that squad in one tumultuous week. If he wants the job he has to keep doing this again and again, not because he's the interim, but because that's what head coaches do to manufacture wins.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For everyone on the fence about winning vs getting a QB.  Lookit we were willing to give up massive amounts for Deshaun Watson.  We can do the same to move up in the draft.  It’s all incredibly risky but a franchise QB is always attainable.  Every win ups the price but it is possible 

We aren’t talking winning the Super Bowl here folks

We have pick 3 right now.  I wouldn’t panic on the QB dilemma yet folks

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

It’s amazing that we win one game and suddenly we’re playoff contenders. Y’all are probably the ones who went nuts after Sam went 3-0 and Kyle Allen was ballin.

No claiming  we are a playoff team here but I believe the post was stated as hypothetically if we were to finish much stronger than we started what would you do about Wilks? Perfectly legitimate question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...