Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most expensive teams to follow


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Does this take into account area? Bc $200 in san Fran is like $500 in Charlotte. Same with Boston plus both have rings.

Also Vegas makes sense for obvious reasons. It’s Vegas.

Cowboys make sense with the whole dynasty/ring generation still alive. 

Also I’ve been to 3/4 of the other stadiums and they’re much nicer than ours.

Trying really hard to understand why in the world the Panthers are on there though…so dumb.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that the parking is brought up in this infographic because a lot of lots that were in Uptown for seasons prior dont exist anymore. They have built high rises and apartments on them. 

 

Id also like to see what 6-10 are and then the rest of the nfl on this chart. I have a sneaky suspicion #32 is going to be above $200. @NASdid that graphic link to a site by any chance?

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Where are they getting their prices?

 

Hotdogs are $6 and 24oz beers are $13 at Bank of America Stadium

 

source: https://www.panthers.com/stadium/concessions

Pffffttt they are wasting money on the hot dogs…now the new grilled cheese stands they have are where it’s at…the brisket melt is *chefs kiss*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...