Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields 61 yard rushing touchdown


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Growl said:

this week Josh Allen was a dual threat QB but if he plays a little better next week he can be mobile again

He's mobile. It just proves running as a QB will never be a long-term solution to winning in the NFL.

You have to be able to distribute the ball. 

He literally just said that in his post-game interview. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah and for several of those “20” games Fields played he was pulled and came in for Dalton. Nagy was swapping QBs left and right last year. This is why it makes sense to compare this year where both QBs have been starters since week 1 and have been getting starter reps all year. That would however derail your whole argument, so I get why you are against it.

He was pulled cause he was horrible, Mills was also pulled for Tyrod. So…..

If you want to get real technical, Mills has more games with with 200 yards, more games with higher passer rating, more games with a 2 to 1 TD to int rating, more games with higher completion%. But Fields has more games with more rushing yards and rushing TD.

So I can see why you waited this long for an argument for Fields 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He's mobile. It just proves running as a QB will never be a long-term solution to winning in the NFL.

You have to be able to distribute the ball. 

He literally just said that in his post-game interview. 

lol Josh Allen has 400 yards rushing this season and Buffalo isn’t even half way through the season

sounds like he’s contributing in multiple ways, and in bulk at that, there’s a heavily used attribute that’s a part of his game that has made his team one of the very best, a duality of threats, if you will

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol Josh Allen has 400 yards rushing this season and Buffalo isn’t even half way through the season

sounds like he’s contributing in multiple ways, and in bulk at that, there’s a heavily used attribute that’s a part of his game that has made his team one of the very best, a duality of threats, if you will

He's being used like 2015 Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

He was pulled cause he was horrible, Mills was also pulled for Tyrod. So…..

If you want to get real technical, Mills has more games with with 200 yards, more games with higher passer rating, more games with a 2 to 1 TD to int rating, more games with higher completion%. But Fields has more games with more rushing yards and rushing TD.

So I can see why you waited this long for an argument for Fields 

It’s simple Fields is getting better the more he plays. That’s typical for QBs. Mills is playing the same level or possibly worse as we started. I can draw a graph for you if it helps. One is trending UP which is what you want while the other is tending to be replaced which is what you don’t want. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need to keep an eye on the Chicago offense for more reasons than just Fields. It's obvious the Bears don't have a good oline or much on the way of playmakers. However that team has shown lots of improvement as this year has gone on, especially the last 3 games. If this trend continues then the Panthers might want to at least interview their OC Luke Getsy for HC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...