Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Land For Sale


Daddy_Uncle
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Varking said:

What’s wrong with the current stadium?

Its not a dome and its basic as hell. Still I love the atmosphere there, especially when we are good and its a big game.  Personally I see no reason to build a new stadium, but Tepper gonna Tepper. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, joemac said:

Its not a dome and its basic as hell. Still I love the atmosphere there, especially when we are good and its a big game.  Personally I see no reason to build a new stadium, but Tepper gonna Tepper. 

I agree with you. The stadium is in a great location as is. Building team HQ and practice facilities there after the failed Rock Hill project makes sense. But billionaires gonna billionaire.

Edited by Prowler2k18
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

Interested to see what they do at the 77/277 interchange. Likely enough room to build a stadium on one side with a bridge over the highway for parking access. 
 

Or they could just build the HQ/Practice Facility there and leave the stadium in the same place. 
 

Or they could build a soccer field/concert venue so we can get our fugging grass back!

Or they could half-build something, Tepper could back out of it, leave it there and move to St. Louis.

  • Pie 6
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put that new stadium $$$ into engineering a "roof" on top of BofA. I was just there. The old girl still looks great.

Perhaps add two arches broadsides and have the clear panels run on tracks on the inside to open and close.

Architecturally that setup may even enhance the beauty of the old girl and provide a dome level of utility. Gorilla glass?! The possibilities.

That would be quite the project to watch go up.

 

 

Edited by rippadonn
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the team really doesn’t need a new stadium and they definitely don’t need a dome

but the panthers exist to help Dave tepper build a personal legacy for himself and you guys need to help accommodate that

if you stupid poor people would stop complaining about the price of food at the game and stop eating before you got there we wouldn’t have this problem

now shut up and give mr tepper $60 for parking and $20 for your hot dog and soda

that’ll be an extra $5 to pee too

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
    • Jackson actually played quite well for a #2 CB #54 in PFF coverage ratings 12 pass break ups solid in run defense..... Hes gonna be targeted just because Jacyee IS being avoided.
    • Yeah, these arguments are getting twisted to the point that it's just an airing of old grievances for the 100th time. No matter what happened in the past, no matter what the "trajectory" is, Bryce has to show why he was a number 1 overall draft pick.  If people didn't like Cam and what he did for us at QB, I hate to see what poor Bryce is gonna get if he doesn't reach Manning-esque heights. 
×
×
  • Create New...