Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers at Ravens thread

rayzor

By rayzor,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

The Burns trolls are pretty bad. Should we have traded him when they included this year’s 2nd? Yeah probably, but in a game where our defense played great and he had a crucial sack (that took them out of FG range) and a drive ending TFL, trying to say he played bad sounds dumb. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

The Burns trolls are pretty bad. Should we have traded him when they included this year’s 2nd? Yeah probably, but in a game where our defense played great and he had a crucial sack (that took them out of FG range) and a drive ending TFL, trying to say he played bad sounds dumb. 

He absolutely should have been traded for the package the Rams offered up.

That said, he played well again today. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Rags said:

If you wanna keep being joyless over two (Two) frst round picks be my guest.

We both know you would've hated those players anway because you refuse to enjoy anything.

I'm not talking about the picks I'm talking about Burns.  He is massively overrated by this fanbase. He's a nonfactor on our team.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

The Burns trolls are pretty bad. Should we have traded him when they included this year’s 2nd? Yeah probably, but in a game where our defense played great and he had a crucial sack (that took them out of FG range) and a drive ending TFL, trying to say he played bad sounds dumb. 

I think the point is, Burns wasn't worth what they offered. 

Fitt thinks we're just  QB away.

We aren't.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jon Snow said:

I'm not talking about the picks I'm talking about Burns.  He is massively overrated by this fanbase. He's a nonfactor in our team.

You can say over rated (An argument I've had abt Moore on our offense) without jumping to the COMPLETE other side of the fence and saying he's a nonfactor.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Seltzer said:

That is an erroneous as it is self-serving. 

You are exposing your lack of football knowledge with that nonsense.

I really want to be nice but that is sheer stupidity.

You're going to be one of those guys complaining when Burns is paid like the player he is. He has more sacks in NFL history at his age and is the best pass rusher we have had since Peppers. He sacked Lamar twice today. You need to educate yourself about what actually constitutes real football.

Seriously, I know I sound like an old fart, but God almighty there used to be a better level of football knowledge and discourse here. It is as depressing as the team has been.

First of all, I have probably forgotten more about football than you have ever learned.  
 

Burns sacks before age 25 is such a stupid stat.  He was young coming into the league.  Compare his number to other “star” defensive ends after 4 years in the nfl (not age) and he’s way down the list.  
 

He constantly gets taken out of the game by single blockers and tight ends.  He misses a ton of tackles, especially at big times.  He’s bad against the run.  He doesn’t change the game.  Burns is not worth a massive contract.  Anyone who watches him every snap knows it.  He gets taken out of plays easily and most of his sacks come when he is unblocked.  

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
Just now, ForJimmy said:

The Burns trolls are pretty bad. Should we have traded him when they included this year’s 2nd? Yeah probably, but in a game where our defense played great and he had a crucial sack (that took them out of FG range) and a drive ending TFL, trying to say he played bad sounds dumb. 

This team needs more than Burns. An extra 2nd this year and 2 more 1sts plus 30m cap available can do a lot to fill the gaps. I want the team to get better. Those picks with a competent GM, new HC and new OC could go a long way in that direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
33inNC Veteran

33inNC

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Anyone who thinks Burns had a bad game is honestly too stupid to engage with. The defense outside of CJ was incredible.

Baker needs to take a permanent vacation from the NFL and take Shi with him.

TMJ was the lone bright spot offensively. 

He is developing into a legit WR2

Common theme with this team, literally ALL of Fhule's Favorites are turning out to be bad and his dog-housers are stepping up.  Oh, how bad was that guy?

And don't say PJ, he is just the lesser of the suck.  Fhule CHOSE Darnold and I bet he made the decision on Baker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seltzer Veteran

Seltzer

Posted
Posted
Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

Ah yes.  The old anyone who disagrees with me is stupid argument. From the guy calling this place a cesspool lol

Because you are making a dumbass argument that is completely untethered from objective reality. Do you need constant validation of how smart and insightful you are??

Because the unvarnished truth is that your take on this is idiotic. Sorry but it is.

It's not personal. If you post something that makes sense I'll agree with you. 

Baker and Shi Smith were horrific. I will agree with anyone about that.

The defense outside of CJ was incredible, including and especially Burns. 

To crap on Burns for this game proves your football ignorance. Again, educate yourself, whatever, and you won't have people calling you out for stupidity.

It really is that simple

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

This team needs more than Burns. An extra 2nd this year and 2 more 1sts plus 30m cap available can do a lot to fill the gaps. I want the team to get better. Those picks with a competent GM, new HC and new OC could go a long way in that direction. 

you'd have to wait 2.5 years to even use any of that... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, poundaway said:

I think the point is, Burns wasn't worth what they offered. 

Fitt thinks we're just  QB away.

We aren't.

We aren't but we aren't much farther away either. More than "just a qb away" but it's more like "a cohesive offensive gameplan away."

idk why everyone acts like it's some mystery why we're bad when it's been the same problem for 2 years now. Excessively bad offense headed by terrible QB play.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhhh what? we just lost 13-3 against a premier football team. If you dont think we win today with a great QB, then I dont think we can see eye to eye on this topic.

Their QB was sick dude.    This was not Jackson's best game.

Believe what you like.  We are not a QB away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Emanuel McNeil Warren + Jacob Rodriguez

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • MHS831
      Panthers WR Xavier Legette named potential trade candidate for 2026 offseason

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • rebelrouser
      Schrader / Jeremiah mock draft experiment

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...