Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If season ended today which QB would you take.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, stirs said:

Richardson at the top of the 2nd makes sense.

He is way more accomplished in passing than Cam ever was.  We would in short order be the Ravens.  His game is close to Lamar Jackson, but with a bit more size.  100yds running and 180 passing per game.

Win the Super Bowl?  Therein lies the development question

You aren't winning the Superbowl with Lamar Jackson. 

I don't want a Lamar. He sucks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

I like Minshew as a Taylor Heinicke type of reliable backup, but does he have the mentoring/knowledge to bring along a rookie?

if the goal is to grow a good mustache then minshew would be a great mentor. as a QB mentor ...i don't know about that.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather BPA, and trade back in for AR 15 if there's a way to pull that off. 

Get your stud at the top, and take the high dev max talent prospect. 

I'd be ok with a trade back with DET as they have two firsts that might facilitate a move like this vs us having to trade back into the 1st. 

Edited by SetfreexX
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

if the goal is to grow a good mustache then minshew would be a great mentor. as a QB mentor ...i don't know about that.

If the Bills don't re-sign Case Keenum, I like the idea of him the best.  I wouldn't mind Andy Dalton either.  Both guys probably realize if they want to stay in the League, a backup gig is the likely role.  Both are former starters that had some success.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

There is no question mark at this end of this thread…it’s a statement.

I believe @ForJimmybrought this up in a thread but there are a number of huddlers that throw out draft a qb but won’t commit to a name because the fear of being wrong is rampant in this place…anyway…

If you are drafting a qb which one from this class ARE you taking.

me it’s Bryce Young.

I certainly understand.  Just about ever QB has turned up snake eyes.  However, the law of averages will catch up and you will get a good QB.  (In other words, even the worst bowler will get a strike at some point.)

I think the jury is still out for Corral.  He still has potential.  He has the talent but, does he have the mentally to play in the NFL.  I hate to admit, I am an Ole Miss alumni who has lost confidence in Corral.

After yesterday’s game, I do not have confidence in Baker.

Darnold has been tested with poor results.  Yes he could have been in a slump.  But, most people don’t slump for a season and a half.

I think PJ Walker is the QB on the roster.  I think he is the easiest to develop.

Though is to take Bryce Young in the draft. If he is available.  I don’t know any others off the top of my head.  PJ Walker should be backup.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, I guess Tepper wasn't the worst possible outcome after all. 😂

He's here all week folks.  Please don't forget to tip your server.  And may I say, the pork chops are especially good tonight.

People, be they fans or personnel people, can find a reason every one of these guys is not worth the risk.  But, thanks to some brilliant moves as part of The Process, we really have little choice but to pick one with our first round pick or try to trade back into the first round after our pick to get somebody at the position. 

I am certainly not opposed to picking one with our first round pick and then cycling back and picking another one later on.  I jokingly said in a thread a few weeks ago that we should draft a QB with every single pick we have, only I was really half-joking!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...