Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft position updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

The only real changes was that the Browns, Packers, Raidahs, and Steelers all "graduated" from the 4-win club.  They were all behind us to start with, but it gives us a bit of a cushion. 

Would have been nice if the Rams and Broncos would have held on.  We still would have been ahead of the Broncos (I think) because of last week's win, but that would have tightened that up a little bit. 

Detroit and Seattle would not have been so amused, since they own those picks.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Bad news for 49ers which could be good news for those picks

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/35182949/49ers-jimmy-garoppolo-ruled-left-foot-injury

As long as that defense keeps playing the way they have, they aren't losing too often. They are also forced to use CMC more right now, which benefits them with the way they play. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Take Penix off the board

 

Is that a done deal or is he able to switch his decision prior to the declaring for the draft deadline?

I think he is making a mistake not going to the draft because he is probably a guaranteed first-rounder. If he plays next year and suffers an injury, he may fall out of the top three rounds

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Is that a done deal or is he able to switch his decision prior to the declaring for the draft deadline?

I think he is making a mistake not going to the draft because he is probably a guaranteed first-rounder. If he plays next year and suffers an injury, he may fall out of the top three rounds

Not sure, I think the deadline is mid January to declare for the draft so maybe he'll change his mind after their bowl game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...